Lea Stephenson: Week 14: High Baroque Art in Spain Continued and Late Baroque Illusionism

Seville

Francisco de Zurbarán, Battle of the Christians and the Moors at El Sotillo, 1638-1640, Spanish High Baroque, patron: Carthusian monastery of Santa Marĺa de la Defensión at Jerez de la Frontera, oil on canvas, 11′ 1″ x 6′ 3 1/4,” Metropolitan Museum of Art

Zurbarán’s Battle of the Christians and the Moors at El Sotillo reflects the Baroque element of depicting time in a visual form. During the 1620s and 1630s, Zurbarán became involved with monastic patrons in Seville, receiving a commission for an altarpiece for the Carthusian monastery of Santa Marĺa de la Defensión at Jerez de la Frontera (Tomlinson, 71). Zurbarán depicts the Battle of El Sotillo, between the Christians and Moors, with historical accounts including the Virgin enthroned against the heavens, revealing to the Christians, the Moors who are ready to ambush, but are ultimately defeated (Tomlinson, 72). The work illustrates secular and religious histories united, referencing the importance of religion in the Spanish Baroque environment (Tomlinson, 72). The scene represents the triumph of Christianity and the involvement of divine intervention, as the Christians become the chosen people (Tomlinson, 72). With the combination of secular and religious histories, Zurbarán also represents both past and present (Tomlinson, 73). In the foreground, a pikeman is dressed in contemporary costume, serving as an intercessor as he directs attention to the Moors in the middle distance (Tomlinson, 73). Zurbarán includes multiple centuries from foreground to middle ground, involving the spheres of the past and present, delineated by the costumes and lighting (Tomlinson, 73). Zurbarán utilizes Baroque elements of time and the representation of the divine to reflect the importance of Christianity in the Spanish Baroque environment.

Tomlinson, Janis. Painting in Spain, El Greco to Goya: 1561-1828. London: Calmann & King Ltd. 1997.

Diego Velázquez, Old Woman Cooking Eggs, 1618, Spanish High Baroque, oil on canvas, 39 1/2″ x 46 5/8,” National Gallery of Scotland, Edinburgh

Velázquez’s Old Woman Cooking Eggs illustrates the Seville trend toward naturalism during his early career. The naturalism of the work aligns with the Spanish Baroque style of naturalism, with the combination of still life and genre painting. Velázquez characteristically focuses upon the detail of the objects, combining still life elements with an activity. Velázquez was beginning to use the tenebrist naturalism of Caravaggio, seen in his bodegones, working with still life and daily life elements (GOA). Many of his scenes which combine still life and genre leave the question of a deeper meaning. Each object is individually depicted, highlighted in a dramatic fashion to capture the sensation of surfaces, while communicating his ability to represent diverse textures and surfaces. Each object represents a different texture and sheen, illustrating the skill in reflecting light. Velázquez involves a splayed perspective, influenced by Flemish art, with the figures in somewhat profile, while there is a view on top of the surface of the table, allowing the viewer to clearly see the elements of the scene, such as the bowl of eggs. Velázquez employs the play of perspectives, instead of a correct viewpoint to illustrate the diverse elements of the scene and reinforcing the observation of reality. The separating eggs continue the observation of nature and Velázquez’s ability to represent the material world. Velázquez mixes a Caravaggio style treatment of observation and Bolognese naturalism with Flemish genre painting, in the pursuit of creating an illusion of reality, a continuation of a Baroque theme.

Pérez Sánchez, Alfonso E. “Velázquez, Diego.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T088463. 23 April, 2013.

Tomlinson, Janis. Painting in Spain, El Greco to Goya: 1561-1828. London: Calmann & King Ltd. 1997.

Madrid

Diego Velázquez, Portrait of Philip IV, c. 1625-1628, Spanish High Baroque, patron: Philip IV, oil on canvas, 6′ 5 1/4″ x 3′ 4 1/4,” Museo del Prado, Madrid

Velázquez’s Portrait of Philip IV represents the developing shift from the previous formal court portraits, to an individual treatment of the monarch. In 1623, Velázquez was called to Madrid to paint a portrait of the king, leading to his appointment as Pintor del Rey, becoming court painter and courtier (GOA). Philip IV Hapsburg (r. 1621-1665) continued the centrality of Madrid as the location of the royal court, serving as the chief patron. Velázquez was appointed through the influence of one of the king’s main advisors and patron, Count-Duke of Olivares. Velázquez painted several portraits of Philip during this period, illustrating his ability to represent individuals and the concept of monarchy, as the success of his portraits led to Velázquez becoming one of central painters to the king. The king is depicted in the manner he would have been seen by visitors, with the hat on the table behind him after greetings (Tomlinson, 87). The king stands next to the console table, referencing the etiquette of the Spanish Habsburg court (Tomlinson, 87). Velázquez focuses upon the illusion of reality and the observation of details, such as the stiff collar, or golilla (Tomlinson, 87). With the reworking of the portrait in 1628, Velázquez developed the details of black with the king’s costume (Tomlinson, 87). The use of chiaroscuro leads to a “hyperreality” with the depiction of the monarch (Tomlinson, 88). The limited palette and heightened contrasts develops a focus upon the individual treatment of the court portrait (Tomlinson, 88). The illumination on the hands and face continue the focus upon the individual features of the king. The standing portrait was rare and reserved for the monarchy, filling the entire space. The attire also represents the elegance of court costume throughout Europe, with the use of black garments and small hands and feet. Velázquez plays with perspective again with the view of looking straight on, but seeing the top of the king’s feet. The naturalistic details and simplified settings, accompanied with the domination of the figure, emphasize the individuality of the king’s portrait.

Pérez Sánchez, Alfonso E. “Velázquez, Diego.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T088463. 23 April, 2013.

Tomlinson, Janis. Painting in Spain, El Greco to Goya: 1561-1828. London: Calmann & King Ltd. 1997.

Diego Velázquez, The Forge of Vulcan, 1630, Spanish High Baroque, oil on canvas, 7′ 3 1/2″ x 9′ 6 1/4,” Museo del Prado, Madrid

Velázquez ‘s The Forge of Vulcan demonstrates the Spanish Baroque treatment of mythological subject matter. Velázquez created the work after studying in Italy in 1629-1631, in which his colors become more luminous with loose and vibrant brushstrokes (GOA). He studied the Roman Bolognese classicism, and the academic treatment of the nude and space, elements reflected in the work (GOA). Many subjects in Spain focused upon history and genre, but less mythology or allegory works, which were imported Flemish and Italian works. In Velázquez’s previous work, there was a sense of timelessness with the figures in their pose and early bodegones (Tomlinson, 91). With the scene depicting Apollo telling Vulcan the infidelity of his wife, there is an emphasis upon a psychological moment, reflected in the expressions of Vulcan and his workshop assistants (Tomlinson, 91). Velázquez’s figures are semi-nude, no longer in heavy draperies of his earlier paintings, but in graceful poses in a clearly defined illusionistic space (Tomlinson, 91-92). The bodies reflect Velázquez studying Greek and Roman sculptures, along with the Renaissance masters in Italy, but maintaining the naturalistic heads of Caravaggio (Harris and Zucker). The work incorporates warmer tones and a more painterly handling of the flesh, a style emerging after his return to Madrid in 1631 (Tomlinson, 92). Velázquez’s work reflects the moment of drama, a Baroque element, treated in a Spanish style with the direct influences of Italian contemporaries.

Harris, Beth, and Steven Zucker. “Velazquez’s Vulcan’s Forge.” Smarthistory. KhanAcademy. http://smarthistory.khanacademy.org/velazquez-vulcans-forge.html. 30 April 2013.

Pérez Sánchez, Alfonso E. “Velázquez, Diego.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T088463. 23 April, 2013.

Tomlinson, Janis. Painting in Spain, El Greco to Goya: 1561-1828. London: Calmann & King Ltd. 1997.

Diego Velázquez, Rokeby Venus, 1648, Spanish High Baroque, patron: possible private commission, oil on canvas, 48 1/4″ x 69 3/4,” National Gallery, London

Velázquez’s Rokeby Venus illustrates his shift in style, while playing with the Baroque element of perspective. By the early 1640s, Velázquez was working in the royal household (Tomlinson, 98-99). After studying Titian in the royal collection, Velázquez depicts a similar subject matter of a reclining Venus, but through a personal treatment instead of the sensuality of Titian (GOA). The technique incorporates Velázquez’s clear strokes of color, or borrones, used to define the form (Tomlinson, 97). The modeling of the nude’s flesh becomes set off by the drapery behind (Tomlinson, 100). Velázquez involves a play of perspective with the reflection of the Venus and her position creating a separation of the beauty from the viewer (Tomlinson, 100). Though the viewer is able to see the reflection of the face, he is still unable to see her intimate parts (Tomlinson, 100). The provocative viewpoint contrasts with the religious and moral scenes of Spanish painting (Harris, 235). Velázquez depicts a mythological scene, while contrasting with the religious emphasis of Spanish Baroque painting with his involvement of perspective to create a seductive scene.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Pérez Sánchez, Alfonso E. “Velázquez, Diego.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T088463. 23 April, 2013.

Tomlinson, Janis. Painting in Spain, El Greco to Goya: 1561-1828. London: Calmann & King Ltd. 1997.

Seville

Bartolomé Esteban Murillo, Virgin of the Immaculate Conception, c. 1678, Spanish High Baroque, oil on canvas, 68″ x 112,” Museo del Prado, Madrid

Murillo’s Virgin of the Immaculate Conception reflects the Spanish Baroque focus upon religious pursuit and the atmospheric quality of Spanish artists. Murillo represented realism with a characteristic sentimental beauty (GOA). During his career, he illustrated various representations of the Immaculate Conception (GOA). Murillo’s Madonna figures demonstrate spiritual purity with idealized beauty (Tomlinson, 75). He involves the Baroque element of space, as the Virgin figure in heaven becomes defined by innocence and grace (Martin, 156). With the representation of the heaven and a divine presence, Murillo creates the work with an eternity with time and space, timeless (Martin, 156). The lighter tones and atmospheric paint creates an ethereal vision instead of reality, as artists after 1660 in Seville and Madrid illustrated visions of heaven in a new style (Tomlinson, 75). The iconography of the Inmaculada, from the Revelation of St. John, was familiar in seventeenth-century Spain, a belief that the Mother of God had been born without sin, emphasized by the sweetness represented by Murillo (Tomlinson, 75). The subject matter of the Immaculate Conception was being discussed in Counter-Reformation Spain, as Murillo’s work responds to the religious environment (GOA). Murillo’s representation involves Baroque qualities of space consideration, while shifting to an atmospheric effect with new styles emerging.

Martin, John Rupert. Baroque. New York: Harper & Row. 1977.

Mena Marqués, Manuela B. “Murillo, Bartolomé Esteban.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T060472. 23 April, 2013.

Tomlinson, Janis. Painting in Spain, El Greco to Goya: 1561-1828. London: Calmann & King Ltd. 1997.

Late Baroque Madrid

Luca Giordano, St. Sebastian Cared for by St. Irene, c. 1665, High Baroque, oil on canvas, Philadelphia Museum of Art

Luca Giordano’s (1634-1705) St. Sebastian Cared for by St. Irene represents the Baroque expressive element of light, applied to a religious scene to involve the viewer in an the emotive quality. The work depicts the religious scene of Sebastian under the care of Saint Irene, while being a saint that is associated with surviving the plague, a popular image used after the plague of 1656 in Naples (PMA). Giordano was heavily influenced by the Neapolitan art of Caravaggio and the work of Jusepe de Ribera (GOA). Though he was also influenced by Pietro da Cortona between 1665-1676, his style varied with the treatment of work (GOA). In his early pictures of saints, Giordano was closely aligned to the style of Ribera, such as the use of a somber palette, observed bodies of men, and patchy illumination (Harris, 139). The work involves a painterly handling of brushwork, defined by the tenebrism, an observed element that appears realistic and references Caravaggio’s influence (Martin, 223). Giordano reflects an interest in penetrating the space and receding background by placing the main action of the figures in the foreground, developing a relationship with the space of the viewer, a visual element emphasized in Spanish religious imagery for devotion. The involvement of the tenebristic light upon the central figures relies upon the senses, continued by the emotive surface with the painterly approach to light (Martin, 54). Giordano presents the body through a dramatic tenebrism, evoking the senses of the viewer and relying upon the dark, monochromatic palette for a naturalistic notion. Giordano involves the Baroque style of dramatic light to create an emotive surface, integrating the senses of the faithful through an atmospheric scene.

Campanelli, Daniela. “Giordano, Luca.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T032371. 21 April, 2013.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

The Philadelphia Museum of Art. “Saint Sebastian Cured by Irene.” Collections. The Philadelphia Museum of Art, 2013. http://www.philamuseum.org/collections/permanent/104396.html?mulR=            669|2. 21 April, 2013.

Late Baroque Illusionism

Giovanni Battista Gaulli (Il Baciccio), Triumph in the Name of Jesus, 1676-1679, nave fresco, Late Baroque, patron: Gian Paolo Oliva, Father-General of the Jesuit Order, fresco, Il Gesù, Rome

Giovanni Battista Gaulli’s (1639-1709) The Glorification of the Holy Name of Jesus represents the Late Baroque style of various blends of medium in the pursuit of a dramatic representation. Gaulli was commissioned in 1672 by Gian Paolo Oliva, Father-General of the Jesuit Order, to fresco the domes, pendentives, and the nave and transept vaults of Il Gesù, supported by Bernini (GOA). The paintings of the pendentives represent the metaphysical transition between vision of heaven in dome and the congregation of the church (GOA). Gaulli involves drama, movement, and saturated colors, leading to various rhythms over the surfaces (GOA). The vault of the nave represents the hosts of heaven kneeling in adoration before divine light, which illuminates from a monogram of Jesus (GOA). The blessed ascend to heaven and the damned to hell, dividing the composition into divisions with the arc of clouds spreading beyond the frame (GOA). The central zone involves a group of cherubs, rising around a mystical light source and sharply foreshortened (GOA). Gaulli involves the details of the effects of light, as the cherubs closest to earth have solid forms, while the light dissolves their mass and lessens the color (GOA). The section of the blessed figures has the illusion of being on a level just below the vault of the church, as the clouds continue over the architectural decoration (GOA). Gaulli’s figures are reminiscent of Bernini’s mature figure style with the elongated forms and curly hair since Bernini helped him design some areas (Harris, 132). The human form emphasis leads to an illusion of a tangible existence with the blessed figures (GOA). Gaulli involves the light in the pursuit of the dramatic work, as the damned continue over the frame, driven downward by light (GOA). The appearance of the nave open to the sky, as figures float up into heaven or fall to hell is continued with the illusion of reality, as many figures are in extreme foreshortening (Harris, 133). The use of illusion, with light, drama, and movement, blurs the heavenly and earthly spheres to respond to the viewer (GOA). At the summit of Gaulli’s fresco is a loop of ribbon, inscribed with the words from a verse in the Epistle of St. Paul, referencing the Church spreading faith throughout the world, a Jesuit focus and ultimate theme of the nave (Harris, 133). The richly decorated architecture framework with the gilded plaster relates to Gaulli’s blend of painting, sculpture, and architecture, a Baroque theme (Harris, 133). Gaulli’s fresco utilizes dramatic representation in religious pursuit to affect the viewer.

Enggass. “Gaulli, Giovanni Battista.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T031034. 30 April, 2013.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Lea Stephenson: Week 13: Velasquez, from Seville to Madrid: The Development of High Baroque Art in Spain

Seville

Juan Sánchez Cotán, Still Life with Quince, Cabbage, Melon, and Cucumber, c. 1602-1603, Spanish High Baroque, oil on canvas, 27″ x 34,” San Diego, CA

Juan Sánchez Cotán’s (1560-1627) Still Life with Quince, Cabbage, Melon, and Cucumber represents the emerging naturalism of the Spanish High Baroque. Cotán was prominent for his still lifes, working in Toledo that included patronage among intellectual circles for secular objects (GOA). Naturalism began to become prevalent in seventeenth-century Toledo, as evident with the private collections holding paintings of fruits and vegetables by Cotán (Tomlinson, 56). These paintings were identified according to the contents, illustrating Cotán’s focus on individual objects (Tomlinson, 57). With many of his still lifes, Cotán arranges the objects in a shallow niche, a window ledge that references the architectural features of Spanish houses during the period (GOA). The background is characteristically a dark space, as the window becomes a form of stage as art imitates nature (GOA). Cotán plays with light and shadows upon the fruit, such as the melon pieces, and the heavy shadows of the window ledge, therefore defining the space (GOA). His closely observed forms continue the illusion of reality (GOA). The fruits and vegetables in the work are organized according to a mathematical curve (GOA). The “austerity” that characterizes his still lifes is possibly a “transfiguration of the commonplace,” reflecting a spiritual focus upon the object, similar to the contemplation promoted in the Spiritual Exercises by St. Ignatius Loyola (Tomlinson, 58). Cotán focuses upon the naturalism in the observation of forms in the pursuit of an illusion of reality.

Jordan, William B. “Sánchez Cotán, Juan.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T075605. 23 April, 2013.

Tomlinson, Janis. Painting in Spain, El Greco to Goya: 1561-1828. London: Calmann & King Ltd. 1997.

Francisco de Zurbarán, Christ on the Cross, 1627, Spanish High Baroque, patron: Seville monastery of San Pablo el Real, oil on canvas, 9′ 6 3/4″ x 5′ 5,” Art Institute of Chicago

Francisco de Zurbarán’s (1598-1664) Christ on the Cross reflects the naturalistic tendencies of Spanish painting and the importance of mystical communion. In Spain, Counter-Reformation ideals continued with the purpose of religious images teaching or serving as a communion tool for the viewer (Tomlinson, 62). After studying in Seville, Zurbarán’s work is characterized by heavy folds of drapery and attention to detail, following naturalism (GOA). The work was commissioned by the Seville monastery of San Pablo el Real, in which the image would have been seen entering the church before celebrating Mass, as the image reinforces the religious service performed in the church (Harris, 217). Zurbarán includes no narrative details, such as a lack of setting, but focuses upon the body (Tomlinson, 69). The precise handling and use of chiaroscuro gives volume to the emaciated form highlights the drapery (Tomlinson, 70). The precise handling and chiaroscuro creates an illusion of reality for the work to become a tool in mystical communion. The body emphasis is meant to inspire meditation on Christ’s humanity and sacrifice (Tomlinson, 70). Zurbarán relates to the Spanish art theorist, Francisco Pacheco stating the intent of religious images, “perfect our understanding, move our will, refresh our memory of divine things” (Tomlinson, 70). Spanish painting during the High Baroque focuses upon achieving a realism for the viewer to bring them closer to a mystical communion with the divine (Martin, 55). The realism of the figures also reflects the awareness of Caravaggio’s aesthetics of strong lighting (GOA). The verisimilitude is achieved by the trompe l’oeil paper pinned to the bottom of the canvas, serving as a calling card of the artist and reflecting his skill (Tomlinson, 70). The work was part of a set of commissions for twenty-one paintings from the Dominicans of San Pablo (Harris, 217). Zurbarán’s popularity rose after this work, leading to an invitation in 1629 to move to Seville permanently (GOA). Zurbarán exhibits his characteristic tendency toward realism to achieve an illusion, ultimately to create a reflection upon the divine.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Jordan, William B., and Claudie Ressort. “Zurbarán, de.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T093699pg1. 23 April, 2013.

Martin, John Rupert. Baroque. New York: Harper & Row. 1977.

Tomlinson, Janis. Painting in Spain, El Greco to Goya: 1561-1828. London: Calmann & King Ltd. 1997.

Francisco de Zurbarán, The Annunciation, 1650, Spanish High Baroque, patron: Gaspar de Bracamonte, for sacristy of San Miguel in Penarande de Bracamonte, oil on canvas, 85 5/8″ x 124 1/2,” Philadelphia Museum of Art

Zurbarán’s The Annunciation illustrates the Baroque interest in illusionism, specifically in relation to a religious scene. Spanish painting during the Baroque became characterized by religious scenes treated in a straightforward manner to manipulate the viewer in prayer. Zurbarán takes on the scene in an intimate setting, while originally for a larger audience. He depicts the idea of the supernatural, with the vision made manifest. Zurbarán is often associated with Caravaggio and emotional intensity, however the scene is represented in a calm manner. The piece of paper is a characteristic of Zurbarán’s work, a way of showing his skill and his interest in illusionism, continued with the vase and play of light. He responds to the Carracci naturalism by retaining the calm treatment and illusionism, instead of the heightened drama of Caravaggio. With the point of view, Zurbarán creates a platform, wit the perspective of looking down, a Northern treatment, since many Spanish artists were looking at art coming from other parts of Europe. The curtain reveals the scene, creating an idea of a real scene with the stage-like setting. With the stage-like scene, Zurbarán maintains an intimacy and emotional resonance with the atmospheric effects, continuing a meditative work for the faithful viewer.

Jordan, William B., and Claudie Ressort. “Zurbarán, de.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T093699pg1. 23 April, 2013.

Diego Velázquez, Christ in the House of Mary and Martha, 1618, Spanish High Baroque, oil on canvas, 23 3/4″ x 41,” National Gallery, London

Diego Velázquez’s (1599-1660) Christ in the House of Mary and Martha demonstrates his early career of naturalism that aligned with the Spanish Baroque trend in naturalism for religious meaning. Velázquez studied with Francisco Pacheco, beginning in 1611, leading to his knowledge of Christian iconography (GOA). Velázquez began to also learn the tenebrist naturalism of Caravaggio, seen in his bodegones, or genre paintings that included still lifes (GOA). The two figures and still life share the foreground, ultimately representing the importance of representing the closely observed natural world (Tomlinson, 67). The background scene consists from a scene from the Gospel of Luke, describing Christ’s visit to the house of Martha and Mary (Tomlinson, 67). The religious scene represents Mary listening to Christ, but admonished by Martha for ignoring her work, though Christ says she is following the righteous path (Tomlinson, 68). The idea of Martha and Mary resonate with the foreground figures of the old woman and kitchen maid. The bodegones take on a moral message with Velázquez, reflecting the religious focus in Spain. The kitchen maid is possibly indignant at having to prepare a meal, as the old woman reminds her of Christ’s rebuke to Martha (Martin, 133). Velázquez paints a “scene within a scene,” a compositional type repeated in his work and possibly inspired by Northern compositions, such as by the Flemish painter, Pieter Aertsen, to enrich the meaning of the painting (Tomlinson, 68). The imagery of the servant is also seen in Velázquez’s teacher’s treatise, El arte de la pintura (1649) by Pacheco, in which he stated the “aim of painting is the service of God,” reflecting the religious significance of genre paintings (Martin, 133). The peasant pictures of Velázquez take on a religious tone, transcending the earthly naturalism and reality (Martin, 134). He also uses a tenebrist tone for the scene, as it remains vague whether the religious scene is a real event occurring, painting on the wall, or mirror reflection (GOA). Velázquez continues naturalistic tendencies for the pursuit of a religious significance.

Pérez Sánchez, Alfonso E. “Velázquez, Diego.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T088463. 23 April, 2013.

Martin, John Rupert. Baroque. New York: Harper & Row. 1977.

Tomlinson, Janis. Painting in Spain, El Greco to Goya: 1561-1828. London: Calmann & King Ltd. 1997.

Madrid

Diego Velázquez, Feast of Bacchus, c. 1628, Spanish High Baroque, oil on canvas, patron: during stay at royal court of Philip IV, 65″ x 88 1/2,” Prado, Madrid

Velázquez’s Feast of Bacchus represents his continuation of naturalism in the progression of his career. In 1623, Velázquez goes to Madrid, reaching success after his royal portrait of King Philip IV, and later studying in Italy to become acquainted with Venetian painting, as his palette lightens in Madrid (GOA). The work reflects the contemporary interpretation to a mythological subject matter, similar to the religious images of Caravaggio (GOA). The scene illustrates a visit to mortals by the god Bacchus, giving the gift of wine (Tomlinson, 90). Bacchus places a wreath on a soldier, while poor peasants surround him, reflecting the gift of wine as a deliverance from misery (Martin, 50-51). Velázquez depicts the peasants as realistic types, as seen with his earlier bodegones (Tomlinson, 90). There is a difference with the flesh of the god and mortals, though Bacchus is still depicted realistically (Tomlinson, 90). The realism of the peasants, a Sevillian style of the work, continues the naturalism of the Baroque by utilizing real people as models (Harris, 229). His biographer Palomino described Velázquez’s work in 1724 as “not painting, but truth” (Martin, 50). He becomes characterized by his use of luminous contrasts and dense coloring, as well as the integration of still-life details, marking the foreground space (GOA). Velázquez supports the naturalistic tendencies by the use of harsh realism to reinterpret a mythological scene.

Pérez Sánchez, Alfonso E. “Velázquez, Diego.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T088463. 23 April, 2013.

Martin, John Rupert. Baroque. New York: Harper & Row. 1977.

Tomlinson, Janis. Painting in Spain, El Greco to Goya: 1561-1828. London: Calmann & King Ltd. 1997.

Diego Velázquez, The Surrender at Breda, 1634-1635, Spanish High Baroque, patron: Philip IV, oil on canvas, 10′ 1″ x 12,’ Museo del Prado, Madrid

Velázquez’s The Surrender at Breda reflects his looser style while evoking the importance of space and painting for the Baroque period. From 1633-1635, Velázquez and other artists were commissioned to paint twelve large pictures depicting Spanish military triumphs for the Hall of Reams (Harris, 230). The Hall of Reams was in the Palacio del Buen Retiro, built for the king at the behest of Conde de Olivares (GOA). The work illustrated an historical event, for the purpose of Spanish propaganda in a room for court ceremonies and royal audiences. The battle scene illustrates the surrender of the Dutch general Justin of Nassau to Ambrogio Spinola, general of the Spanish forces, in Breda (Tomlinson, 92-93). Velázquez completes a classically balanced composition, with the group of Spanish victors on one side and defeated Dutchmen on the left, also reflecting the surrender as a symbolized key is given to Spinola (GOA). The lances on the Spanish side also represent the Spanish victory (Tomlinson, 94). Velázquez achieves a luminosity with the use of white underpainting, while using a technique of strokes of color, borrones, to define the form, a technique compared to Titian (Tomlinson, 93, 97). He includes naturalism with the attention to light upon the various forms (GOA). Velázquez unifies the foreground action and background, including the horse on the right to lead the viewer to the soldiers in the rear, ultimately a visual progression (Tomlinson, 94). He depicts the Spanish moral superiority, integrating the compositional device of visual distance to refer to an event being celebrated (Harris, 231). Velázquez illustrates the development of his style, departing from precise handling, while representing a scene that supports the image of his patronage source, the royal court.

Pérez Sánchez, Alfonso E. “Velázquez, Diego.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T088463. 23 April, 2013.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Tomlinson, Janis. Painting in Spain, El Greco to Goya: 1561-1828. London: Calmann & King Ltd. 1997.

Diego Velázquez, Las Meninas, c. 1656, Spanish High Baroque, oil on canvas, 10′ 5 1/4″ x 9′ 1/2,” Museo del Prado, Madrid

Velázquez’s Las Meninas demonstrates the importance of space in the Baroque, and the nobility of painting. In the early 1640s and his later career, Velázquez’s produced less work due to his responsibility as a member of the royal household (Tomlinson, 98-99). Velázquez considers the theme of the nobility of painting with the play of perspective and space. He depicts the royal household while including a self-portrait of himself working behind the canvas (Harris, 237). Infanta Margarita and her attendants are represented, along with the portraits of Philip IV and Mariana in the reflections of the mirror (Harris, 237). The work demonstrates the immediate truth of what is seen, such as the royal household, while Velázquez is in the act of painting, facing out toward the viewer (GOA). The viewer takes on that of the artist’s subject (GOA). However, the mirror reflects images of the king and queen, as the royal couple is the models, which Velázquez paints and are the viewers of the painting (GOA). The members of the household appear to be looking out at the royal couple posing for their double portrait (Harris, 237, 239). The orthogonal, perspectival lines meet in a vanishing point beneath the arm of the man in the doorway, as the ideal viewer would be before this point, but the viewer stands to the right of the king and queen in the mirror (Tomlinson, 105). The work plays with the perspective, considering if it is actually the king and queen in the space or the painting reflection, as the viewer becomes the bystander of the painter in the presence of the royal patrons (Tomlinson, 105). Velázquez involves three-dimensional space, dealing with presences within and outside the painting, while creating psychological and spatial tension between work of art and beholder (Martin, 168). Velázquez also portrays himself as an intimate member of the royal family, furthering his claims for the nobility of painting and a higher social standing for himself (Harris, 239). He wears the red cross of the order of the Santiago, added after he was granted the title in 1658 (GOA). Velázquez achieves the royal admiration, utilizing this element to further the noble status of painting and separate from manual labor, but intellectual with the perspectival play (Tomlinson, 104-105). Velázquez considers the Baroque focus upon space and the inclusion of the viewer, while continuing his aims to elevate the status of painting.

Pérez Sánchez, Alfonso E. “Velázquez, Diego.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T088463. 23 April, 2013.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Martin, John Rupert. Baroque. New York: Harper & Row. 1977.

Tomlinson, Janis. Painting in Spain, El Greco to Goya: 1561-1828. London: Calmann & King Ltd. 1997.

Seville

Bartolomé Esteban Murillo, Christ Bearing the Cross, c. 1665-1675, Spanish High Baroque, oil on canvas, 60 3/4″ x 83,” Philadelphia Museum of Art

Bartolomé Esteban Murillo’s (1618-1682) Christ Bearing the Cross represents the naturalistic approach to religious scenes by Baroque artists. Murillo was trained in Seville and was associated with a softer, atmospheric quality with lighter palette, though later in his career, shifting to brown and gray shades (GOA). The work takes on a meditative tone, furthered by the darker palette and Christ’s increased contact with the viewer with the eyes, leading to more intimacy between viewer and figures. Murillo focuses light on the faces and hands, the most expressive aspects of the composition, while also helping the eye to lead around the canvas. The soft light of Murillo is included, creating an emotional resonance and meditative function, since there are less figures in the religious scene. The dress of Christ is a monastic references, possibly reflecting the patronage source. The work becomes iconic rather than narrative, though Murillo retains naturalism with the dark palette and observation of detail, such as the Caravaggio setting and naturalism of the figures, along with the use of tenebrism for a dramatic scene to inspire the viewer in prayer. He retains an emotive scene, especially with the soft strokes compared to Caravaggio’s precise work, furthering the intimacy of the religious scene for a Spanish viewer.

Mena Marqués, Manuela B. “Murillo, Bartolomé Esteban.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T060472. 23 April, 2013.

Lea Stephenson: Week 12: High Baroque Architecture: Bernini and Francesco Borromini, High Baroque Individualist

 

Bernini

Gallery

Gallery

Gianlorenzo Bernini, Towers for façade portico, 1637-1641, destroyed in 1646, High Baroque, patron: Urban VIII, St. Peter’s, Rome

Bernini’s towers for the façade portico reflect his reliance upon papal patronage and the shift in his career. In 1629, Bernini was appointed architect to the fabric of St. Peter’s (GOA). By 1636, Bernini was designing a remodeled version of two bell towers begun by Maderno, and flanking the façade of the basilica of St. Peter’s (GOA). Bernini’s design of the bell towers’ for the façade rested on underground springs, unstable foundation (Hibbard, 118). The south tower was completed and cracks resulted in the structure (Hibbard, 118). The bell towers were demolished under the papacy of Innocent X and secured the end of Bernini’s position as papal favorite. The destruction, representing Bernini’s shift away from reliance on the papacy to other commissions, also resulted in commissions for other artists in Rome.

Hibbard, Howard. Bernini. New York: Penguin Books. 1965.

Mezzatesta, Michael P., and Rudolf Preimesberger. “Bernini.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com/subscriber/article/grove/art/T008287pg2. 2 April, 2013.

Gianlorenzo Bernini, S. Andrea al Querinale, 1658-1670, High Baroque, patron: Jesuits, funded by Prince Camillo Pamphili, Rome

Bernini’s S. Andrea al Querinale represents the High Baroque architectural style of concave and convex elements to engage the viewer. With the layout of Rome, artists designed façades to entice the viewer into the church, serving as a centralizing form that would dynamically embrace the viewer. Orders were made to have a sculptural plasticity, while the façade reflects the crowded urban environment and Bernini’s awareness of the contemporary architectural work in Rome. The recessed arms and entrance responds to a tight urban environment. The use of recession and undulating forms become a pattern for High Baroque architecture, with the alternating concave and convex curves. The long narrow site led to Bernini utilizing an oval plan, but giving the movement of a longitudinal plan, also using the symbolic qualities of a centralized plan. By placing the axis on the long side, Bernini brings a direct focus on the altar as the viewer enters the building. The façade includes the idea of concave and convex alternating rhythms, while also classical and stable forms. The classical temple portico creates a two-story reading of the façade, the monumental triumphal arch form and the entablature at another level, which matches the interior. The exterior towards the street with the steps echoes the shape of the convex portico. Bernini adopts a more dynamic alternation of shapes and return to classical forms, such as with the circular temple. The interior is dedicated to St. Andrew, as Bernini merges decoration and iconography together. He treats the architectural space similar to his treatment of sculpture, relying upon a concetto and bel composto, as the spectator perceives the whole, then walks around to experience the many views. The high altar represents the martyrdom of St. Andrew, with the statue of the saint rising into the heavens, and above the statue, the dome. Bernini creates a three-dimensional spatial container for a sculpted and painted program, symbolically representing the martyrdom and ascension through architecture and light coming through the windows of the high drum. Bernini involves art and nature through his use of natural light and depicted light to create a religious experience for his viewer.

Gianlorenzo Bernini, Scala Regia, 1663-1666, High Baroque, patron: Alexander VII, Vatican, Rome

Bernini’s Scala Regia represents his mastery of space and illusion. The stairs were ceremonial for the pope, leading to the Vatican Palace from St. Peter’s.  The remodeled stairs required a suitable design for the elderly pope and a lighted passage (Hibbard, 163). The stairs went up different levels to the main floor of the Vatican Palace. From the viewpoint of looking down the portico of St. Peter’s, Bernini created the appearance of a regular space going up. Where the stairs were narrowest, Bernini made the passage look wider with the use of columns (Hibbard, 163). The below view, with more width available, Bernini set the columns out from the wall, while the higher view, as the passage goes in, columns were placed closer to the wall and diminished in height (Hibbard, 163). As the viewer stands below, the narrowing above appears to be a standard height and width through Bernini’s use of illusion (Hibbard, 163). Bernini utilizes sculpture and windows for the landing when breaking the space, while employing natural light (Hibbard, 163). Bernini manipulates classical regularity and perspective to achieve a monumental space and illusion, characteristic of the High Baroque.

Hibbard, Howard. Bernini. New York: Penguin Books. 1965.

Borromini

Gallery

Gallery

Carlo Maderno, Gianlorenzo Bernini, Francesco Borromini, Palazzo Barberini, 1628-1633, High Baroque, patron: Barberini family, Rome

The Palazzo Barberini illustrates the High Baroque styles of shifting toward a new palace plan, while including the collaboration of several architects. The Palazzo Barberini represented the fusion between palace and villa. The cardinal nephews of Urban VIII were responsible for increasizing the size of the palace, which includes a typical urban façade with an open lower arcade, as the courtyard also displays the function of a villa with the fountain and open wings. The work was first designed by Carlo Maderno (1555-1629) for the Barberini family, before Urban VIII became pope, eventually becoming papal architect while designing the villa, including the work of Gianlorenzo Bernini and Francesco Borromini (1599-1667). Borromini moved to Rome in 1619, able to work with his distant relative Maderno on the Palazzo and eventually the façade and nave of St. Peter’s (GOA). The architecture of the Baroque period signified an expansion in scale, as seen with the Palazzo Barberini and the merging of types, referencing Renaissance models, such as the Villa Farnesina. The Palazzo continues the High Baroque dynamic quality, as seen with the fenestration. The window treatment integrates the use of classical orders on the façade, using superimposition. The treatment transitions from the lower story, upwards, moving to an increase in orders, leading to an expressive purpose of the orders, while offering a structural support in the transitional elements. Maderno centralized the focus, emphasizing the central bay with the parapet, an area used for ceremonial purposes. Typical of a Baroque façade, there is a reliance upon a central axis and a movement toward the center with the dynamism of recessing architectural elements. After Maderno died, Bernini took over the project, a favorite of the Barberini family, as Borromini stayed on. Borromini became responsible for the top story and fenestration, integrating a more perspectival frame. Bernini was possibly accountable for the main piano mobile story, continuing Maderno’s plans. Borromini’s handling of the square windows, on either side of the double arcade windows, was adapted from the square attic windows of Michelangelo at St. Peter’s (Harris, 80). Borromini however integrates the dynamic and dramatic quality of the High Baroque by having the pediment angled forward at the sides, before curving over a scallop shell in the center, as stylized garland hangs over (Harris, 80). Borromini’s side window treatment took on sculptural quality in the treatment of the frame. The upper story window frame and addition of the parapet also defined the High Baroque dynamism and lively appearance, as Borromini put the entablature of the window frame on an orthogonal treatment. With this treatment, the arch appears to have depth with the perspectival approach. The H-shaped plan of the building mixed the urban and villa shapes, utilizing the wings as a mixed form. The new plan also illustrated an illusion coextensive space, with the open courtyard and flow of space (Martin, 188). The H-plan allowed the opportunity to develop a new type of interior, with new traffic patterns, such as a hallway inside. The interior of the Palazzo involved a monumental staircase to enter the upper story, becoming part of the development of ceremonial staircases, later oval staircases by Borromini. The arrangement of the interior spaces involved apartments, a cluster of rooms associated with a single individual. Borromini’s collaboration on the Palazzo ended in 1631 after a fight with the Barberini family regarding the project (GOA). The Palazzo represented Borromini’s early developing characteristic of utilizing the curve for architectural surfaces to signal the High Baroque.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Martin, John Rupert. Baroque. New York: Harper & Row. 1977.

Stein, Peter. “Borromini, Francesco.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T010190. 17 April, 2013.

Gallery

Gallery

 

Gallery

Gallery

 

Gallery

Gallery

Francesco Borromini, San Carlo alle Quattro Fontane (“San Carlino”): cloister, church plan and interior; façade, 1638-1667, High Baroque, patrons: Spanish Discalced Trinitarians, Rome

Borromini’s San Carlo alle Quattro Fontane illustrates the High Baroque focus upon space and curvilinear movements. In 1634, Cardinal Francesco Barberini helped Borromini gain his first commission as an independent architect, with the monastery and church of S. Carlo for the Spanish Discalced Trinitarians (GOA). The monastic building was finished by 1636, but the work on the church did not begin until 1638, culminating in the façade finished in 1677. Borromini had to fit multiple elements of the church and monastery in a small area, adjusting to the urban environment. The monastic building with a small courtyard included a convex curvature of its corners and pairs of monumental Doric columns (GOA). Pairs of columns were at the angles, next to the convex protrusions of the walls that supported an arched opening at each end (Harris, 81). Borromini used smaller columns to support the upper walkway that included a balustrade with vase-shaped balusters alternately inverted, thus emphasizing a rhythm and movement, an element of High Baroque architecture (Harris, 81). The oval plan involved a symmetrical, quatrefoil design, including the oval form of the dome and half-oval curves of the side chapels (GOA). The sections of semicircles forms are alternated with flat surfaces (GOA). Half ovals were at each end of the cross axis, and semicircular sections at either end of the longitudinal axis, ultimately two convex intrusions (GOA). The entrance and altar face each other on the long axis (Harris, 81). The alternating forms emphasized movement and a dynamic interior, characteristic of the High Baroque use of space. The interior, specifically the lowest level to the main entablature, involved alternating curved and straight areas of the wall, along with arches (GOA). Above the entablature, there were the dome pendentives, along with the half-domes of chapels and their arches (GOA). The pendentives were created by four semi-domes that supported the main oval dome, as the pendentives depicted the life of St. Charles Borromeo (Harris, 81). For the upper story of the interior, Borromini created an illusion of the dome being suspended with the use of a dome ring to hide the base of the coffered oval bowl (GOA). Borromini created an illusion of height through the interlocking forms (Harris, 81). Borromini also created a unity in the interior with the use of columns, either framing or acting as support for arches (GOA). The movement of walls and “sculptural volumes by the columns” become the main elements of the interior (GOA). The use of movement and alternating forms continued to the façade. The upper level was completed by Borromini’s nephew, including three concave bays instead of Borromini’s use of alternating concave and convex (GOA). The lower part of the façade was completed by the time of Borromini’s death. The façade includes the alternating concave-convex-concave form, while using large columns with small ones on both levels (Harris, 82). Borromini utilizes the space and the power of the curve to create movement. The façade involves an advance in the center, an illusion of a forward thrust (Martin, 190). Borromini’s design reflects the complex use of space in the High Baroque architecture, while using the surface to emphasize movement.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Martin, John Rupert. Baroque. New York: Harper & Row. 1977.

Stein, Peter. “Borromini, Francesco.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T010190. 17 April, 2013.

Gallery

Gallery

Gallery

Gallery

Francesco Borromini, Oratorio of the Filippini: monastery; oratory and façade, 1642-1650, High Baroque, patrons: Oratorians, Rome

Borromini’s Oratorio of the Filippini continues the High Baroque concave projections and the use of illusion of space. The Oratorians appointed Borromini as chief architect for their community building in 1637, adjacent to the Chiesa Nuova (GOA). He was assigned to execute the design of the previous architect, Paolo Maruscelli, though Borromini left in 1652 due to difficult relations with the Fathers in completing work (GOA). An attractive exterior was desired, though the Fathers did not want to compete with the Chiesa Nuova, leading to Borromini making the façade lower and with a cheaper material (GOA). Borromini was able to display his skill though in using the brick for decorative effects (GOA). The plan for the oratory was for a rectangular interior, meant for the Order’s sermons and choral music (Harris, 84). The building also included motifs connecting to palazzi, such as the main staircase modeled on the Palazzo Farnese (GOA). A concave plan was across the five main bays, emphasized by the pediment with curves and straight lines (Harris, 84). Borromini continued the use of curves and movement to create a dynamic façade, such as the central bay on the ground floor is convex, while the bay above is concave (Harris, 84). Borromini uses the inverted baluster for the balustrade above the main cornice, creating the rhythm as seen with his previous designs (Harris, 84). Similar to his other works, Borromini provided adaptations to traditional styles. Roman façades were previously straight, however, Borromini replaced the objectivity with a new subjective approach that was underlined by the emotion of concave and convex rhythms (GOA). He also creates an illusion that the building extends further, but the hall is across the façade and extends at the sides (GOA). Borromini utilizes High Baroque elements of emotion in the format of architectural design and movement.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Stein, Peter. “Borromini, Francesco.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T010190. 17 April, 2013.

Gallery

Gallery

 

Gallery

Gallery

 

Gallery

Gallery

 

Gallery

Gallery

Francesco Borromini, Sant’Ivo alla Sapienza: courtyard; church exterior with dome and lantern; plan and interior, 1642-1650, High Baroque, Rome

Borromini’s Sant’Ivo alla Sapienza relies upon the dynamic quality of the exterior and lantern. Giacomo della Porta had already designed a round church, but Borromini created a centralized, domed church (GOA). The ground plan includes triangles with apexes cut away in a concave curve (GOA). The centers of the sides thrust forward to create large semicircles (GOA). Both levels of the arcades of the cloister goes across the concave façade (Harris, 82). Borromini continues to utilize undulating forms to suggest movement in the space, thus involving the viewer. The next level also includes a low concave wall, with oval openings filled with an eight-pointed star, a screen for the lower area of the drum of the dome (Harris, 82-83). Borromini involves the Chigi coat of arms, integrated with the dome like turrets, since the church was completed during the papacy of Alexander VII (Harris, 83). The movement of design continues with the lantern, a spiral shape, possibly referencing the path to wisdom (GOA). The interior design alternates concave and convex sections, becoming concave at the lantern level (Harris, 83). The plan of the domed church is in a six-pointed star, representing the dedication of the church to wisdom, sapienza (Harris, 83). The interior was lit only form the dome, but manipulated to illuminate the altar area (GOA). Borromini involves alternating forms and light to create a dramatic interior space.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Stein, Peter. “Borromini, Francesco.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T010190. 17 April, 2013.

Gallery

Gallery

 

Gallery

Gallery

Francesco Borromini, Sant’Agnese in Agone: façade (Palazzo Pamphili and church begun by Girolamo Rainaldi and son Carlo), 1652-1668, High Baroque, patron: Innocent X, Piazza Navona

Borromini’s Sant’Agnese in Agone involves the focus upon space when integrating the architecture in a larger environment. Borromini was commissioned by Innocent X in his plans for the Piazza Navona, integrating his extension of the Palazzo Pamphili (GOA). With the new façade, Innocent X wanted to unite the parts of the building (GOA). Borromini’s design for the Palazzo was rejected, and Girolamo Rainaldi and his son Carlo took on the project due to the conservative taste of the pope (GOA). In 1646, Borromini added a large gallery to the palazzo, which opens onto the Piazza Navona (GOA). In 1653, the pope dismissed Rainaldi and his son as supervising architects for S. Agnese, as Borromini was hired (GOA). Borromini was meant to involve the small early Christian church and also to house the tomb of the pope, while serving as a chapel of the neighboring family palazzo (GOA). Borromini demolished the façade, but emphasized his characteristic curved form, making space for stairs in front of the church, in order to not break into the piazza (GOA). Borromini wanted to continue his Baroque sense of movement with the proposal for the crossing piers. The proposal included making them convex and go into the crossing area, but requiring a different kind of dome (GOA). The pope rejected the idea with is conservative taste, retaining the dome with a drum (GOA). The façade involved concave link blocks that connected with two west towers, creating a rhythm of the forms and extending the façade sideways into the area of the palazzo (GOA). Ultimately, Borromini established a concavity of the façade, with the convex thrust of the dome and the concave blocks (GOA). Borromini was dismissed in 1657 by Prince Camillo Pamphili (GOA). Borromini continues the recessive movement in the façade design, while creating a monumental space linked to the pope’s family.

Stein, Peter. “Borromini, Francesco.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T010190. 17 April, 2013.

Lea Stephenson: Week 11: Bernini, Impresario of the Baroque

Bernini and Urban VIII

Gianlorenzo Bernini, Baldacchino, 1624-1633, High Baroque, patron: Urban VIII, bronze and gilt, height 93′ 6,” St. Peter’s, Rome

Bernini’s Baldacchino represents his reliance upon papal patronage and his ability to merge architectural and sculptural forms. With the election of Cardinal Maffeo Barberini becoming Pope Urban VIII in 1623, Bernini became the papal architect due to his close relationship with the pope (Harris, 98). With the papacy of Urban VIII, 1623-1644, Bernini established his place as a central artist in seventeenth-century Rome. The previous papal architect, Carlo Maderno, died in 1629, who was the Architect of the Fabbrica of St. Peter’s and had undertaken private projects for the Barberini family. The architectural decoration was initially under Maderno’s direction, including the involvement of Bernini. With the New St. Peter’s, such as the extension of the nave with the use of classical architecture proportions and an enlarged scale of the building, Bernini was commissioned to emphasize the importance of the high altar over the tomb of St. Peter. As a representation of his ability to work in multiple forms, Bernini created the Baldacchino, framing the altar, while adapting the traditional altar canopy with the use of bronze and a monumental scale (Harris, 99). Bernini did not disrupt the spatial flow of the interior, allowing the viewer to see through the Baldacchino’s columns to the apse (Harris, 99). The monumental canopy served the dual function of marking from afar the important liturgical space, while acting as a canopy over the grave of St. Peter, a signifier of kings. With the scale of the canopy, Bernini employed other artists, such as a foundry when dealing with the problems of weight and structure. Bernini incorporates the iconography of the first church of St. Peter’s with the twisted columns, which itself was an allusion to the Temple of Solomon in Jerusalem. The original columns were referenced in the upper story niches, columns that were relics from the Old St. Peter’s, ultimately a continuity from the high altar of the New St. Peter’s, to the columns of the Old St. Peter’s, and back to the Temple of Solomon. The twisted columns, based on eight antique examples from the Temple, emphasized Christian dominance, similar to the use of obelisks (Harris, 99). To keep the columns’ pressure from going out, Bernini created ribs, four huge volute scrolls, at the top of the canopy, while also producing the appearance of a crown. He furthered weighted the columns down in the center. Similar to a dome’s use of an oculus, Bernini employed the crowning ring, the crown on the orb atop the canopy, to weigh down the center, counteracting the structural forces, along with the sculptures weighing down the ribs. However, the crowning elements were usually attributed to Francesco Borromini, one of the contributing artists working under Bernini on the decoration of the church (GOA). The bronze flaps were decorated with Urban VIII’s symbol of a trio of bees, alternating with heads of cherubim, including suns and laurel leaves, a signature of the patron (Harris, 99). The gilded ball with a cross atop the canopy represented the world united under Christ, while an image of the Holy Ghost was depicted under the canopy over the altar (Harris, 99). The twisted columns with gilded bronze included the involvement of light, as light delineated the details, creating a sense of movement. The vines on the columns illustrated the sense of naturalism of the Baroque, as Bernini used cast olive branches, a reliance upon the natural world to achieve realism. Bernini and Pietro da Cortona shared a similar belief of the artistic overcoming nature. Though the work appears solid, Bernini achieved the naturalism and movement to create an illusion of theatre, such as the appearance of bees moving through the branches. The Baldacchino became a symbol of the strength of the Roman Catholic Church, with the early references to decoration and a personal monument to Urban VIII with the heraldic symbols (Hibbard, 79). Bernini also accomplishes the canopy serving as a “mediator” between the viewer and the large scale dimensions of St. Peter’s, utilizing the hybrid of sculpture and architecture to achieve active forms (Hibbard, 90).

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Hibbard, Howard. Bernini. New York: Penguin Books. 1965.

Mezzatesta, Michael P., and Rudolf Preimesberger. “Bernini.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com/subscriber/article/grove/art/T008287pg2. 2 April, 2013.

Gianlorenzo Bernini, St. Longinus, piers program, 1629-1638, High Baroque, patron: Urban VIII, marble, eight, 14′ 5,” St. Peter’s, Rome

Bernini’s St. Longinus illustrates his creation of active forms through his use of textures and the affects of light. With Bernini elected Fabbrica of St. Peter’s in Maderno’s place, due to the patronage of Urban VIII, he enlarges and decorates the four niches in the piers of the crossing facing the Baldacchino from 1629-1635, 1635-1638(Harris, 99). The niches incorporate four statues of saints that relate to the relics placed in the niches above the sculptures, framed by the columns of Old St. Peter’s. Bernini commissioned three sculptors to make three depictions of the saints, all ordered in 1629, including Andrea Bolgi’s St. Helena (1631-1639), Francesco Mochi’s St. Veronica (1631-1640), and François Duquesnoy’s St. Andrew (1629-1639). The decoration project undertaken by Bernini also reflects his managerial skills with the large scale commission. Bernini was only able to execute St. Longinus alongside the other work for the decoration of the cathedral. The sculpture was the largest work completed by Bernini to date, as he also made bozzetti for the work. St. Longinus was a Roman centurion who converted to Christianity when stabbing the spear into Christ’s side (Harris, 100). The sculptures surrounding the space were meant to reflect different moments of Christ’s Passion for pilgrims (Harris, 100). Bernini executes the statue by using large grooves, becoming spatially successful with occupying an active position, further emphasized by the dynamism of the drapery. The grasped spear and outstretched arms create a triangle forming the figure, while the folds reflect the emotion of the saint (Hibbard, 83). The gesture becomes clear and dramatic in the occupied space (Hibbard, 84). The drapery involves the play of light and dark, as Bernini creates a surface with a ridged finish (Hibbard, 84). There is a fine texture for the skin and a coarser, deeper treatment for the drapery with the heavy folds (Hibbard, 84). The ridged surfaces are able to catch light, leading to the use of light and dark to emphasize drama and emotion, while Bernini produces textural colorism through the optical effects (Hibbard, 84). The dramatic folds of the drapery with the movement reflect the internal drama of conversion for the saint (Harris, 101). Ultimately, the work becomes spatially alive with the textural colorism and occupation of space in a dynamic manner (Hibbard, 87).

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Hibbard, Howard. Bernini. New York: Penguin Books. 1965.

Gianlorenzo Bernini, Tomb of Urban VIII, 1628-1637, High Baroque, patron: Urban VIII, marble and bronze, St. Peter’s, Rome

Bernini’s Tomb of Urban VIII reflects his adaptation of traditional sculptural forms to achieve a dramatic scene. Urban’s tomb was placed in a niche to the right of the central apse niche (Harris, 103). The tomb includes a seated bronze effigy of the pope on a high podium, with his arm raised outward toward the viewer (Harris, 103). The robes of Urban involve movement and texture, emphasizing the dramatic scene and dynamic space of the tomb (Hibbard, 106). Bernini depicts the allegories of Charity and Justice, illustrating the grief of the spectator and the personifications of Urban’s virtues (Hibbard, 107). Charity cradles a child, metaphorically representing Charity reaching out to the faithful who seek Divine Love (Harris, 103). Justice’s head is directed toward Heaven for divine guidance, and the interactions between the figures humanize the allegorical representations for the viewer (Harris, 104). The bronze sarcophagus with the scrolled volutes includes a book with Urban’s name inscribed, along with three bees over the tomb, expressing the work as a tribute to the deceased pope (Harris, 104). The inclusion of the winged skeleton by the bronze sarcophagus further develops the tomb into a spectacle, a dramatic scene (Hibbard, 107). The humanization of the allegorical women and the emergence of death create an involvement with the viewer and an emphasis upon a stage-like scene, characteristic of the High Baroque.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Hibbard, Howard. Bernini. New York: Penguin Books. 1965.

Alessandro Algardi

Alessandro Algardi, Meeting of Leo I and Attila, 1646-1653, High Baroque, patron: Innocent X, marble, height 28′ 1,” Vatican, St. Peter’s, Rome

Alessandro Algardi’s (1598-1654) Meeting of Leo I and Attila illustrates a contrast with the work of Bernini and the shift in papal patronage. With the papacy of Innocent X, Algardi’s career rose with the removal of Bernini from papal favorite. The work includes a specific type of sculpture Bernini avoided (Harris, 108). Algardi’s style consisted of a classical approach, which the Pamphili admired and contrasted with the dramatic, emotional representation of scenes by Bernini (GOA). The relief, in a vertical format, is based on a historical event, in which Attila turns away, frightened by the figures of Peter and Paul overhead, as Leo I points to a crucifix behind him (Harris, 108). Algardi splits the composition in half to divide the earthly and heavenly realms. The movement of the figures is accompanied by the drama of the climactic moment. Algardi the principal figures almost free of the block, while others remain the background (Harris, 108). The different treatment of the figures leads to a control of the light, instead of textures, an emphasis on the shadows through the degree of the figures emerging in the viewer’s space (Harris, 108). Algardi emphasizes the gestures and movement of the scene, as the drama is reinforced by the shadows with the free figures. The work illustrates the talents emerging during the Innocent X papacy and an alternative manner to handling figures to emerge into the viewer’s space.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Preimesberger, Rudolf. “Algardi, Alessandro.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press, 15 July, 2008. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T001772. 9 April, 2013.

Bernini and the Innocent X Papacy

Gianlorenzo Bernini, Ecstasy of St. Teresa, 1645-1652, High Baroque, patron: Cardinal Federico Cornaro, marble, height 11′ 6,” Cornaro Chapel, S. Maria della Vittoria, Rome

Bernini’s Ecstasy of St. Teresa represents the Baroque’s illustration of divine experience and the dramatic moment. With the papacy of Innocent X (1644-1655) after Urban VIII, Bernini fell out of favor, reflected in the destruction of his towers for the façade portico after cracking began (1637-1641, destroyed in 1646). Bernini became confined to sculptural projects, due to less work as papal architect and his loss of patronage. Cardinal Federico Cornaro commissioned Bernini to decorate the family chapel dedicated to St. Teresa of Avila in the left transept of Santa Maria della Vittoria, a saint canonized in 1622 (Harris, 108). Bernini’s work also reflects drawing attention to his abilities as a sculptor after falling out of favor (Harris, 108). The sculptural work depicts St. Teresa’s vision, as the angle lifts her garment, about the stab her with an arrow (Harris, 108). The scene reflects the transverberation from the angel, depicted with the closed eyes and open mouth, a dramatic moment (Harris, 110). The divine experience included a mystic sense of withdrawal from the world, while involving both pleasure and pain (Martin, 104). Bernini’s ability to involve multiple forms becomes reflected in the use of architectural space, as the sculpture is behind a large architectural frame (Harris, 108). The architectural framework offers a single view of the climactic moment of ecstasy, while creating a staged drama similar to a theatre setting (Hibbard, 136, 143-144). Bernini includes two openings on the sidewalls of the private oratories, representing members of the Cornaro family, who similar to the viewer, look on the sculptural scene (Hibbard, 130). Bernini emphasizes the creation of a spectacle by the architectural framework and directing the viewer with the Cornaro group (Hibbard, 130-131). He is able to create an entire experience reflecting the divine encounter of St. Teresa, with the inclusion of light through the top, creating physical light upon the figures (Harris, 110). Clouds of stucco, covering part of the architecture and decoration of the vault, are accompanied by physical light to reflect the revelation of the saint (Hibbard, 134). Bernini was influenced by the theatre, creating a staged drama The use of sunlight involves the realm of the viewer, reflecting the divine illumination of St. Teresa, and bringing the mystical into the tangible world of the viewer (Martin, 232). The inclusion of the viewer with the divine experience reflects St. Ignatius of Loyola’s Spiritual Exercises, which Bernini practices, involving the faithful visualizing the religious event in his setting (Hibbard, 138). Bernini’s dramatic representation of the climactic moment enters the realm of the viewer through the inclusion of an overall visual experience.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Hibbard, Howard. Bernini. New York: Penguin Books. 1965.

Martin, John Rupert. Baroque. New York: Harper & Row. 1977.

Gianlorenzo Bernini, Four Rivers Fountain, 1648-1651, High Baroque, patron: Innocent X, travertine and marble figures, granite obelisk, Piazza Navona, Rome

Bernini’s Four Rivers Fountain illustrates the dynamic representation achieved when depicting allegorical figures for the purpose of demonstrating the strength of the Roman Catholic Church and papacy. Though Bernini was not invited to compete for the design of the fountain commissioned by Innocent X, the pope saw his model and Bernini’s design was selected (Harris, 111). The fountain was in collaboration with the Pamphili for their space surrounding the Piazza Navona (Harris, 111). The fountain involved the use of an obelisk, while being directly connected to asserting the identity of the Pamphili family in “their” piazza (Harris, 111). Bernini’s design included the depiction of a mountain, contrasting with the linear geometry of the obelisk and the movement of the carved peaks (Harris, 111). The marble figures of the fountain was undertaken by Bernini’s assistants, but executed by his design (Hibbard, 121). The four river gods include representations of Europe, Africa, Asia, and the Americas with each corner of the fountain. The depiction of Europe touches the papal insignia, close to the Pamphili residence in the Piazza Navona (Harris, 112). The Nile covers his head, indicating the source of the river not yet known (Harris, 112). Bernini’s design incorporates elements associated with the four continents, while the summit includes the Pamphili coat of arms surmounted by the papal tiara and keys (Harris, 112). At the top of the obelisk, the bronze dove, another Pamphili symbol, is connected to the Biblical story of Noah, further indicated by the water (Harris, 112-113). The fountain, with the emphasis upon various parts of the world and the identity of the Pamphili family, represents the triumph of the papacy (Hibbard, 122). Ultimately, the four river gods illustrate the spreading of Christianity over the world, as the summit is surmounted by papal insignia (Harris, 112-113). With a base on all sides and a view opening through the sculpture, Bernini achieves the illusion of the obelisk hovering above (GOA). The use of space also involves the dynamic handling of the material and the reliance upon the viewer. Compared to his other works and the principle viewpoint, the fountain focuses upon the spectator moving around the fountain to achieve the composition (Harris, 113). Bernini’s depiction of the river gods continues representations of the strength of the post-Tridentine Church and the adaptation of his work to incorporate the space, an important feature of the Baroque.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Hibbard, Howard. Bernini. New York: Penguin Books. 1965.

Mezzatesta, Michael P., and Rudolf Preimesberger. “Bernini.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com/subscriber/article/grove/art/T008287pg2. 2 April, 2013.

Bernini and Alexander VII

Gianlorenzo, Piazza S. Pietro, 1656-1667, High Baroque, patron: Alexander VII, Vatican, Rome

Bernini’s Piazza S. Pietro represents his return to papal patronage and the hybridity of forms. With the papal reign of Alexander VII (1655-1667), Bernini was papal architect again and continued to work on the decoration of the New St. Peter’s. The Piazza was based on a long axis and parallel to the face of the basilica and obelisk erected by Sixtus V (GOA). The Piazza was designed for a large amount of people, such as for Easter and other occasions, in which the blessing was pronounced by the pope from the Benediction Loggia above the entrance to the Vatican basilica, a blessing given urbi et orbi, to the city and to the world (Martin, 151). Bernini created a design incorporating a colonnade with curving wings around the oval piazza, comparing the design to the maternal arms of the Church, embracing Catholics to solidify their faith (Martin, 151). The colonnade supported statues of saints and martyrs over each massive column in the front row, while being only half the height of the façade, making the façade appear taller in the creation of a monumental space (Harris, 102). The Piazza achieves a concetto with his inclusion of the overall space, while the colonnade wings take on a sculptural form when embracing the visitors (Martin, 151). The Piazza S. Pietro continues Bernini’s use of multiple forms to create a dynamic space, while emphasizing the strength of the Roman Catholic Church.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Hibbard, Howard. Bernini. New York: Penguin Books. 1965.

Martin, John Rupert. Baroque. New York: Harper & Row. 1977.

Gianlorenzo, Cathedra Petri, 1657-1666, High Baroque, patron: Alexander VII, marble and bronze, St. Peter’s, Rome

Bernini’s Cathedra Petri demonstrates the dramatic movement of the High Baroque achieved by Bernini when decorating the New St. Peter’s. The completion of the interior project was under Alexander VII, as the Baldacchino acts as a frame for the Cathedra Petri. The work fills the apse, relating to the Chair of St. Peter, the symbolic seat of the bishop. The depiction of the seat is held by the four Fathers of the Latin and Greek Church (Harris, 106). The reliquary inside the structure includes the original chair of St. Peter (Harris, 106). The chair, with the volute legs and gilded stucco clouds, creates an intense decorative scene for a dynamic space. Bernini designs the scene to appear as if the chair is in motion, settling on Earth with the help of the Church Fathers (Harris, 106). The viewer witnesses the dramatic movement of the chair, creating a tangible scene. The backside of the chair depicts a scene of Christ’s charge to Peter, referencing the context of the seat (GOA). Two putti above support the papal keys and tiara, amidst the gilded stucco clouds (GOA). Bernini’s bel composto relies upon the incorporation of the architectural space. The design includes Michelangelo’s window, using the light to further emphasize the reenactment of the movement and the mystical nature of the event (Harris, 107-108, GOA). Bernini’s work utilizes the drama when creating a scene through the involvement of space and movement.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Mezzatesta, Michael P., and Rudolf Preimesberger. “Bernini.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com/subscriber/article/grove/art/T008287pg2. 2 April, 2013.

Gianlorenzo Bernini, Tomb of Alexander VII Chigi, 1671-1678, High Baroque, patron: Alexander VII, marble, St. Peter’s Rome

Bernini’s Tomb of Alexander VII Chigi designates Bernini’s use of architectural space when creating a dynamic work. The tomb continues similar elements from the Tomb of Urban VIII, while the location is over a doorway. Alexander VII kneels toward the high altar in prayer, while a skeleton with an hourglass emerges from the drapery (Harris, 105). The hourglass, indicating the importance of representing time during the Baroque, illustrates the pope’s time on Earth is over, as he is ready to accept his fate (Harris, 105). The allegorical depictions of Charity are on the left, with Truth on the right, included with a sun to represent light and truth (Harris, 105). The back of the niche includes two more allegorical women, Justice and Prudence. The concetto of the work is achieved by the skeleton lifting the drapery folds, while incorporating the doorway (Harris, 105).

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Lea Stephenson: Week 10: The Young Bernini, the Borghese, and the High Baroque

Gianlorenzo Bernini

Gianlorenzo Bernini (and Pietro Bernini), Bacchanal: A Faun Teased by Children, ca. 1616-1617, High Baroque, marble, height 52 1/8,” The Metropolitan Museum of Art

Gianlorenzo Bernini’s (1598-1680) Bacchanal: A Faun Teased by Children illustrates his use of material and texture at an early age. In his father’s studio, Pietro Bernini, he learned how to depict textures (Harris, 88). The sculpture was found in the artist’s studio, completed when he was nineteen years old, showing what he could achieve. The work combines the naturalism of Caravaggio and the classicism of Carracci. The mythological subject matter, with Bacchus, involves a new approach with the diagonal viewpoint, as Bernini focuses upon the idea of site, while maintaining the influence of antiquity. Bernini moved away from Mannerist sculpture in the round, but designed for a specific site and entrance. Bernini creates a composition, concetto, to include the whole when viewing the work, then to perceive the sculpture at multiple viewpoints, including a specific and dual perspective. The sculpture also demonstrates his marble carving ability, the appearance of the flesh. Bernini drills the work for a deep penetration to capture light in a specific way, while also using a rough tooth chisel tool on the tree to create another light effect. Bernini considers different textures, such as matte and polish, achieving a chiaroscuro and volume with the textural modeling effect. The support of the tree becomes an integral part of the composition, but consists of a dynamic organization with the imbalance and diagonal lines. Bernini, at an early age, begins to think of the viewer’s perception in the use of material and location of the work.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

The Metropolitan Museum of Art. “Bacchanal: A Faun Teased by Children.” Collections. The Metropolitan Museum of Art. http://www.metmuseum.org/Collections/search-the-collections/120022469?rpp=20&pg=1&ft=bernini&pos=1. 2 April, 2013.

Gianlorenzo Bernini, Bust of Paul V Borghese, High Baroque, c. 1618, patron: Borghese family, marble, height 13 5/8,” Borghese Gallery, Rome

Bernini’s Bust of Paul V Borghese reflects his early work as a sculptor, transitioning from the traditional format of portraiture to his dynamic innovations. By this time, Bernini had already executed a large number of works at a young age, reflecting his genius stature. Bernini, born in Naples, worked with his sculptor father Pietro Bernini and moved to Rome by 1605. When Bernini was nineteen years old, his father worked on the funerary chapel of Pope Paul V, leading to the Borghese circle, especially Cardinal Scipione Borghese, becoming aware of the young Bernini’s talents. With the bust of Pope Paul V, Bernini retains a traditional representation of bust portraiture, contrasting with the development of his dynamic style when representing the life-like quality of his sitters. The bust’s uncut eyeballs and blank express, deriving from antique works, demonstrates a reserve, especially due to the conservative subject matter of the pope (Hibbard, 31). The bust represents Bernini developing his use of life-like qualities to achieve the verisimilitude of his later work.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Hibbard, Howard. Bernini. New York: Penguin Books. 1965.

Gianlorenzo Bernini, Bust of Cardinal Scipione Borghese, second version of 1632, High Baroque, patron: Cardinal Scipione Borghese, marble, 30 3/4″ high, Borghese Gallery, Rome

Gallery

Gallery

Gianlorenzo Bernini, Cardinal Scipione Borghese, 1632, High Baroque, graphite and red chalk on cream paper, 9 15/16 x 7 1/4,” Pierpont Morgan Library, New York

Bernini’s Bust of Cardinal Scipione Borghese demonstrates the High Baroque naturalism capturing immediacy. At a young age, Bernini was patronized by Cardinal Scipione Borghese, until 1624 when shifting to the elevation of papal architect under Pope Urban VIII. The bust was commissioned however when Bernini was beginning to work on Barberini commissions (Hibbard, 90). Scipione Borghese was known for his position as an antiquity collector, but took on the role of patron with Bernini. Bernini’s sculptural style became characterized by the achieved naturalism, admired for the life-likeness of his portraits. The elements of the portrait bust emphasize the presence of Scipione Borghese, as Bernini aimed to create a “speaking likeness,” the ideal moment of before or after someone has spoken (Harris, 92). The sculpture follows the contours of the cardinal’s cape, as his head remains tilted, eliminating perfect symmetry in the movement of the material, leading the viewer to follow the modeled lines and light reflected on the folds of the cape (Harris, 92). Bernini also carves the eyeballs to create an illusion of pupil and iris (Harris, 92). The pursuit of naturalism continues with the movement of material, the undone buttons and lips slightly parted with the realistic muscles of the face. Bernini achieves a sense of transience, an immediacy gained from serious portraiture by depicting the act of speaking (Hibbard, 90). Bernini accomplished the capturing of life-like qualities in quick sketches, participating in caricature. For the bust of the Cardinal, the sitter conversed with Bernini while he drew the head from different angles (Harris, 92). Bernini’s preparatory process for sculptures included both drawings and mocking up works in clay, portraying an immediacy and dynamic quality transferred to the final work. The life-like quality of the bust includes an involvement with the living world, achieving a new dimension of reality with the dynamism and verisimilitude within the viewer’s space (Hibbard, 90). After completing the first version of the bust, Bernini found a crack in the marble across the forehead, presenting this version to the Cardinal first, then showing the second version he had completed in three or fourteen days (GOA). Bernini represents the High Baroque immediacy and presence in the life-like quality pursued by sculpture.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Hibbard, Howard. Bernini. New York: Penguin Books. 1965.

Mezzatesta, Michael P., and Rudolf Preimesberger. “Bernini.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com/subscriber/article/grove/art/T008287pg2. 2 April, 2013.

Gianlorenzo Bernini, Aeneas, Anchises, and Ascanius, 1618-1619, High Baroque, patron: Cardinal Scipione Borghese, marble, height 7′ 3,” Borghese Gallery, Rome

Bernini’s Aeneas, Anchises, and Ascanius illustrates his early development of textures to accomplish a naturalness. His early works began with the patronage of Cardinal Scipione Borghese, who commissioned Bernini for over life-size marble statues for his new villa in Rome (GOA). The work depicts a passage from the Aeneid, in which Aeneas carries his father and brings his son from the burning city of Troy (GOA). Bernini demonstrates his interest in trying to create a complex, multi-figure sculpture, a difficult concept in marble, leading him to develop a composition in which the figures are self-supporting. Bernini builds his tree trunks into the work so they become part of the figure, while providing support. With the figural works of Bernini, he creates one main viewing position for a greater impact, often from the front, as seen with the facial expressions of Aeneas and his father only visible from the front (Harris, 85- 86). Bernini’s idea of viewing the work from a specific point was meant to conceive the concetto, or concept, on first site, perceived as a unified entirety, then viewing the elements of the whole. Bernini retains some of the Mannerist principles of his father with the crowded composition (Hibbard, 34). However, Bernini achieves the realism of the Baroque with the display of surface texture, such as the muscles of Aeneas and skin of the old man, creating a contrast between the three ages of Man (Hibbard, 34). Bernini takes on the narrative challenge of depicting three ages by the indication of textures and treatment of physical features. The sculpture also references well-known works by Michelangelo and Raphael in Rome, while continuing the study of Hellenistic sculpture with the hair of Aeneas (Hibbard, 36). The work also references a religious importance with piety toward God and parent, as the old father carries the family penates, household gods, representing “faith over adversity,” a Counter-Reformation theme (Hibbard, 36). The use of the oval base also refers to the developing aesthetic of bel composto, unity of the arts, as in the case of the work, architecture and sculpture. Bernini creates a classical work that considers the High Baroque use of space and naturalism of texture.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Hibbard, Howard. Bernini. New York: Penguin Books. 1965.

Mezzatesta, Michael P., and Rudolf Preimesberger. “Bernini.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com/subscriber/article/grove/art/T008287pg2. 2 April, 2013.

Gianlorenzo Bernini, Pluto and Persephone,1621-1622, High Baroque, patron: Cardinal Scipione Borghese, marble, height 7′ 5,” Borghese Gallery, Rome

Bernini’s Pluto and Persephone demonstrates his ability to manipulate marble in achieving a dramatic treatment and naturalism. Bernini depicts the climactic moment of Pluto capturing Persephone, a new approach to create a greater impact upon the viewer and achieve an immediate experience (Hibbard, 48). Compared to Giambologna’s Rape of the Sabine Women with the sequence of compositions, Bernini relies upon a main front view (Harris, 88). The reference to Giambologna’s work would also be recognizable to the knowledgeable viewers of the period. With the single viewpoint, the work gains a spatial immediacy for the viewer (Hibbard, 48). The moment depicts Persephone’s tears down her face and screaming mouth, including a contrast between the male physicality and female flesh (Harris, 88). Bernini represents his skill in making marble look alive and a flesh quality, tenero and vero, with Pluto’s indentation upon Persephone’s thigh. Bernini demonstrates his knowledge of the quality of plasticity. He uses contrapposto, a long tradition, but in pose and relationship between the figures, a work of contradictions in male and female, or age and youth. The stabilizing base, including Cerberus guarding the underworld, indicates Bernini’s mastery of textures, with the dog’s hair (Harris, 88). Bernini utilizes the texture of marble to imitate a range of surfaces, paying attention to light reacting with marble (Harris, 88). The sculpture also represents the pictorial effects of clay modeling through traditional methods of carving (Hibbard, 45). Bernini continues the High Baroque technique of affetti, with the emotions of Persephone’s tears, parted mouth, and flying hair, which also references previous emotional representations of Caravaggio. The work became a political gift, given to Cardinal Ludovico Ludovisi, nephew to Pope Gregory XV. Bernini’s sculpture captured the dramatic climatic moment and attention to texture to achieve a naturalism when utilizing marble.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Hibbard, Howard. Bernini. New York: Penguin Books. 1965.

Gianlorenzo Bernini, Apollo and Daphne, 1623-1624, High Baroque, patron: Cardinal Scipione Borghese, marble, height 8,’ Borghese Gallery, Rome

Bernini’s Apollo and Daphne continues the use of climactic moment for a dynamic sculptural work of the High Baroque. Bernini depicts Apollo chasing the nymph Daphne, as she turns into a laurel tree, inspired by a passage in Ovid’s Metamorphoses (GOA). Bernini challenges poetry and painting, with the transmutation of marble into leaves and the realism of the cloth and flesh (GOA). Bernini achieves the illusion of temporality and the passing moment, with the instant succession of Apollo chasing Daphne (Martin, 199-200). The work continues to emphasize the succession of the moment and dynamic through the placement of the sculpture for the viewer, who first only sees the back of Apollo and his drapery, but the drama continues as the viewer moves, similar to the succession of instants (GOA). With this other figural group in the Villa Borghese, Bernini demonstrates the new naturalism of making marble appear malleable, and combining painting and sculpture into a new medium (GOA). The concept of the flesh being overtaken by the bark of the tree illustrates Bernini’s achievement at controlling marble to achieve a heightened realism. He experiments with the appearance of nature and quotation of art in the idea of the figure turning into the natural. The climactic moment of turning into the tree is further emphasized by the sudden dramatic movement (Hibbard, 48, 50). The different psychological states of Daphne demonstrate transitory emotions, a reference to Caravaggio and Reni works in the Borghese collection (Hibbard, 50, 53). His notion of the representation of figures became heavily influenced by his study of the Borghese collection, which included antiquity, Carracci works, and Caravaggio. The exposure led to a classical influence upon his works, similar to his Roman contemporaries, who looked to antiquity for inspiration, such as Apollo’s hair deriving from the Apollo Belvedere (Martin, 256). Bernini continued to emphasize the superiority of sculptures, by capturing the figures running and the motion (Harris, 90). The work illustrates the new naturalism emerging with the depiction of moments and the drama of the High Baroque.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

 

Hibbard, Howard. Bernini. New York: Penguin Books. 1965.

Martin, John Rupert. Baroque. New York: Harper & Row. 1977.

Mezzatesta, Michael P., and Rudolf Preimesberger. “Bernini.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com/subscriber/article/grove/art/T008287pg2. 2 April, 2013.

Gianlorenzo Bernini, David, 1623-1624, High Baroque, patron: Cardinal Scipione Borghese, marble, height 5′ 7,” Borghese Gallery, Rome

Bernini’s David represents the progression of sculpture in the High Baroque to capture a specific moment for immediacy. The sculpture’s story involved Cardinal Maffeo Barberini using his face as a model for David, while during the process he became Pope Urban VIII. The example of modeling represents the importance of emotions through gestures and facial expressions in Baroque naturalism (Martin, 3). The intense emotional expression of David with the pursed lips and knitted brow reflects Bernini’s observation of the natural facial expressions (Martin, 74, 77). Bernini develops a new relationship of the viewer to the sculpture, incorporated with the narrative action. David is depicted in the climactic moment of launching the stone, contrasting with the previous depictions of stopped time (Harris, 90). David, similar to Apollo, will continue the motion, as Bernini emphasizes again the idea of sculpture’s superiority to painting (Harris, 90). The viewer becomes involved with the narrative action, the space around the statue includes the viewer imagining Goliath and the drama about to occur, creating a spatial continuity (Hibbard, 54). The sculpture was designed for a niche, as the viewer had a specific point of view when entering the room. The viewer participates in a spatial and psychological manner, with the immediacy of the movement and imagined drama occurring (Hibbard, 57). Bernini utilizes classical models in some of the elements, while maintaining modern subjects, such as quotations of Caravaggio and Annibale Carracci, artists in the Borghese collection. Bernini’s work represents the dramatic shift in narrative format for High Baroque sculpture to gain an immediacy for the viewer.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Hibbard, Howard. Bernini. New York: Penguin Books. 1965.

Martin, John Rupert. Baroque. New York: Harper & Row. 1977.

Gianlorenzo Bernini, Truth Revealed by Time, 1646-1652, High Baroque, marble, Borghese Gallery, Rome

Bernini’s Truth Revealed by Time continues his mastery of naturalism in the use of materials. The work, completed later in his career, was originally a monumental design that included columns, obelisks, and mausoleum destroyed by Time (Martin, 214). The figure of Truth incorporates the Baroque metaphysical view of the world (Martin, 118). Bernini includes the personification of Truth as a nude woman, representing how simplicity is natural to her principles (Martin, 121). Bernini also depicts her upon the globe, her power over the world, and holding the sun, truth illuminated by light (Martin, 121). Bernini achieves verisimilitude with the illusion of soft flesh (Martin, 48). Bernini believed that by taking away the effects of painting, his sculptural works could achieve a “marvellous softness,” with the flexibility of the material (Martin, 48). Bernini’s work represents a mastery of the material by portraying the naturalism of the flesh, no longer the previous artificial Mannerism, but a life-like quality. The work was completed later in his career, serving as a personal justification after his failure with the capanili of St. Peter’s (Hibbard, 185). The sculpture remained unfinished with the figure of Time never carved to reveal Truth (Hibbard, 185). Bernini continues the mastery of marble from his previous figural works in the Borghese Gallery for a High Baroque naturalism.

Hibbard, Howard. Bernini. New York: Penguin Books. 1965.

Martin, John Rupert. Baroque. New York: Harper & Row. 1977.

Week 9: High Baroque Rome: Pietro da Cortona and Andrea Sacchi

Pietro da Cortona

Pietro da Cortona, Portrait of Marcello Sacchetti, ca. 1626, High Baroque, patron: Marcello Sacchetti, oil on canvas, 52″ x 39,” Galleria Borghese, Rome

Pietro da Cortona’s (1596-1669) Portrait of Marcello Sacchetti illustrates Cortona’s relationship with patrons and his study of antiquity. The Sacchetti family were wealthy Florentines who moved to Rome, marked by Marchese Marcello Sacchetti who was Urban VIII’s treasurer beginning in 1623 (Harris, 14). Most of Cortona’s work during the 1620s was commissioned by the family (Harris, 14). With the patronage of the Sacchetti family early in his career, Cortona was also introduced to other aristocrats with humanist and antiquarian interests, such as the Mattei family. The Sacchetti’s patronage from 1623-1624 established Cortona’s career, since the family was connected to the new reign of Urban VIII and Barberini circles. Cortona also built the Villa Sacchetti for the family at Castelfusano, 1625-1629, his first architectural project (GOA). The Villa was modeled on Renaissance buildings and the classical tradition, but heightened to the spectacle of the Baroque with the inclusion of giant staircases, a spectacle connotation, a performance of architecture and art. The Villa exemplifies the High Baroque elements emerging, with a dynamic classical approach. Cortona worked in multiple mediums, like Bernini and Raphael, continuing the Renaissance ideas of what gave an artist authority with the understanding of disegno. The portrait of Marcello Sacchetti depicts him with a limited number of objects, but specifically chosen pieces to illustrate his attachment to the study of antiquities with the detail of the table, which Cortona also studied beginning in the early 1620s with Cassiano dal Pozzo (GOA). The minimal indications, such as the handkerchief to represent the wealth associated with lace, gives a stature to the portrait of his patron. Cortona’s portrait demonstrates the importance of patronage for the rise of his career.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Merz, Jörg Martin. “Cortona, Pietro da.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T019663. 26 March, 2013.

https://blackboard.temple.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tabGroup=community&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fcontent%2FcontentWrapper.jsp%3Fcontent_id%3D_238512_1%26displayName%3DLinked%2BFile%26course_id%3D_8304_1%26navItem%3Dcontent%26attachment%3Dtrue%26href%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fgallery.temple.edu

Gallery

Pietro da Cortona, Martyrdom of St. Martina, n.d., High Baroque, patron: Cardinal Francesco Barberini, oil on canvas, location not found

Cortona’s Martyrdom of St. Martina represents the shift to the High Baroque style of dynamism and movement in altarpieces. In 1634, Cortona began the rebuilding of SS. Luca e Martina, the church of the Accademia di S. Luca in Rome (GOA). Similar to his contemporaries, Cortona’s work on the church illustrated the multiple mediums mastered by High Baroque artists to create an interdisciplinary work. S. Martina was uncovered in 1634, including a ceremony, which reflected the importance of uncovering new saints during the strengthening of principles and programs of the Catholic Church. The rebuilding of SS. Luca e Martina also included the patronage of one of Urban VIII’s nephews, Cardinal Francesco Barberini, one of the sponsors for rebuilding the church and a patron for Cortona, as he was transitioning from living with the Sacchetti family. Cortona also became responsible for the altarpiece for the decorative program, displaying an example of High Baroque altarpiece as the work moves from the Early Baroque Carracci format, but still retains an asymmetrical composition, with the architecture on one side anchoring the work, while the view moves into the background. Cortona’s figures in the altarpiece become characterized by diagonals, no longer stable, but have a dynamic quality, as if spinning. The hourglass shape of the composition continues the dynamic forms and asymmetrical composition, with St. Martina as the bottom of the glass form, and the putti becomes the upper part. The spiral element becomes enhanced by the drapery and the clouds, while retaining the classical tradition of the frieze across the foreground. Cortona studied the work of Titian, who completed similar compositional format with the use of putti and clouds, emphasizing the heavenly and earthly hierarchy. The use of architecture defines the distance and space of the composition, as the different steps to go into the distance, a development seen previously with extreme distance emphasized by the inclusion of figures and architecture. His work during the 1630s becomes characterized by warm, sensuous, and richly colored forms, as seen with St. Martina, since Cortona believe painting should unite the disegno of Raphael and Titian’s colore (GOA). Cortona plays with the classical forms, but includes active and dynamic elements of movement, becoming an influential figure in the High Baroque.

Merz, Jörg Martin. “Cortona, Pietro da.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T019663. 26 March, 2013.

Gallery

Gallery

Pietro da Cortona, Process of St. Charles Borromeo during the Plague in Milan, 1667, High Baroque, oil on canvas, S. Carlo ai Catinari, Rome

Cortona’s Process of St. Charles Borromeo during the Plague of Milan illustrates the continuing use of diagonals to enhance classical traditions, while reflecting the importance of new saints emerging. The scene depicts the newly created Counter-Reformation saint, Charles Borromeo during the event that characterized his saintly behavior of going out into the streets of Milan among people during a plague of the 1570s. Cortona uses similar compositional strategies of distance, emphasizing the importance of foreground with the main figures and the strong diagonal enhanced by glimpses of architecture. Cortona employs a shift in scale from the foreground to distance through the use of the canopy’s diagonal. The figures in the foreground also continue the tradition of mirroring each other to create an entry and exit into the picture, keeping the viewer in the act of reading the work, part of the classical frieze tradition. Cortona continues the use of diagonals to create a dynamic composition, as seen with the diagonal from the plague victim to Charles, then to the angel, reinforced by the canopy and dramatic light. The torches carried by the figures also provide strong diagonals, displaying Cortona’s skill in handling light and representing the flicking of light due to wind, mirroring the light that would have been the church environment of the painting. Cortona’s ability to create a pattern of color unifies the composition, enhanced by the pattern of light and dark, which involves a theoretical concern for compositional unity from the classical approach. The observation of Venetian artists later in Cortona’s career integrates a more painterly approach, as the texture of the brushstrokes also unifies the composition. Cortona’s work represents the High Baroque use of diagonals and unification of composition through color.

Merz, Jörg Martin. “Cortona, Pietro da.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T019663. 26 March, 2013.

Pietro da Cortona, Rape of the Sabines, 1631, High Baroque, patron: Marcello Sacchetti, oil on canvas, 9′ x 13′ 9,” Pinacoteca Capitolina, Rome

Cortona’s Rape of the Sabines represents the dynamic classicism emerging with Cortona’s High Baroque style. The work depicts the historical event of the rape of the Sabine women, but was accompanied by several other works for the Sacchetti family to decorate their Roman palazzo, Palazzo Sforza Cesarini (GOA). The mythological series, such as Triumph of Bacchus, referenced masterpieces in several palaces and villas around Rome, but Cortona emphasized his representations as the newest adaptations of these subjects. The work was a complement to the other mythological subjects, connected to the wedding of Giovanni Francesco Sacchetti and Beatrice Tassoni Estense (GOA). The series was meant to be compared to Annibale Carracci and Raphael, while illustrating Cortona’s ideas about narrative and painting. Cortona creates an illustration of dynamic classicism, with the classical frieze composition, but the main figures move left to right to represent a dynamism, also with the groupings in the use of diagonals. The subsidiary compositional forms lead to an increased movement in the work. The architecture on either side creates a distance in the space, while Cortona creates a stage-like setting for the foreground. The architecture employs classical elements for a story of antiquity, referencing his knowledge of antiquities and his patron’s interest. With the dramatic treatment in subject, Cortona also unified the composition for a unity of narrative through the painterly brushstrokes, blending one form into another. The patches of color distributed through the composition also unify the movement of each figure. Cortona uses different facial expressions, a stage-like effect. He continues the use of the spiraling energy of the diagonal to heighten the dramatic in his work. Cortona establishes a new approach to classical narrative, or historia, by emphasizing scenographic, stage-like dramatic action scenes through the use of gesture and affetti with arrangement of figures. Cortona with the pictorial surface wanted to establish painting’s superiority to sculpture (Harris, 114-115).

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Merz, Jörg Martin. “Cortona, Pietro da.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T019663. 26 March, 2013.

Pietro da Cortona, Glorification of the Reign of Urban VIII, 1633-1639, High Baroque, patron: Cardinal Francesco Barberini, fresco, Palazzo Barberini, Rome

Cortona’s Glorification of the Reign of Urban VIII (or, Allegory of Divine Providence) utilizes illusionism for a new treatment of ceiling decoration. Cortona had previously used quadri riportati for ceiling decoration, but with the fresco ceiling of the Salone in Palazzo Barberini, Cortona used a combination of painted architecture and sculpture, overlapping narrative to create a unity (Harris, 119). Cortona employs illusionistic architectural framework in the decoration of the vault, leading to a unified surface (GOA). Cortona created a feigned architectural framework, with four mythological subjects along the central field (Martin, 164). The decoration depicts historical and allegorical scenes to represent the virtues of the Barberini, specifically the triumphs of Urban VIII, and his immortality (GOA). The representation of allegory of divine providence becomes connected to the reign of Urban VIII, consisting of five main units (Harris, 119). The upper part of the central rectangular area illustrates a large laurel wreath held by theological virtues, while above them, Rome holds the papal tiara and Religion with the crossed keys of the papacy (Harris, 119). Cortona integrates three golden bees, the Barberini symbol. The viewer looks up into space, as the allegorical women are overhead (Harris, 119). The smaller figure of Divine Providence creates a triangle comprising of Saturn and the Three Fates, as their cloud banks overlap the ornamented stone entablature, and piers support the four corners of the ceiling (Harris, 119). Cortona creates a division of two sections, emphasized by the allegorical women moving into the central area from the sides (Harris, 119). Cortona also depicts an airy space through the use of light and color (Martin, 164). Cortona characterizes the High Baroque as an art of rhetoric, as the artist adopts a new triumphal attitude for the Church.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Martin, John Rupert. Baroque. New York: Harper & Row. 1977.

Merz, Jörg Martin. “Cortona, Pietro da.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T019663. 26 March, 2013.

 

Pietro da Cortona, Trinity in Glory, Assumption of the Virgin, 1647-1651, High Baroque, fresco, S.M. in Vallicella, Chiesa Nuova, Rome

Cortona’s Trinity in Glory and Assumption of the Virgin illustrates the High Baroque’s characteristic illusionistic treatment. Cortona worked on the fresco decoration of S.M. in Vallicella, completing the half-dome apse of Assumption and the cupola of Trinity (Martin, 164). After his return from Florence, Cortona worked in Chiesa Nuova (GOA). The two scenes are separated into separate architectural fields, but Cortona involves the viewer in the space through the illusionistic treatment of the scenes. The viewer in the nave, sees the two scenes, as unified, since Cortona connects images across “intervening space” (Martin, 164). Mary is on clouds within the lower zone of the space from the vaulting of the apse, but Cortona’s illusionistic treatment creates the appearance of Mary ascending toward the cupola to Christ and God the Father (Martin, 164). The crossing of spaces represents the ascent into the celestial realm of the dome (Martin, 164). Cortona ultimately involves the viewer, since the ascent occurs in the viewer’s own space within the church, bridging the space between earthly and heavenly realms (Martin, 164).

Martin, John Rupert. Baroque. New York: Harper & Row. 1977.

Merz, Jörg Martin. “Cortona, Pietro da.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T019663. 26 March, 2013.

Andrea Sacchi

Andrea Sacchi, Vision of St. Romualdo, 1631, High Baroque, patron: Cardinal Lelio Biscia, oil on canvas, Pin. Vaticana, Rome

Andrea Sacchi’s (1559-1661) Vision of St. Romualdo represents the contrast in High Baroque styles, exemplified by the reduced manner of Sacchi and the dramatic movement of Cortona. Sacchi’s work was commissioned for the high altar of the Camaldolese Order in the new church in Rome, S. Romualdo (GOA). The scene depicts a group of Camaldolese monks listening to the saint retell his vision, as the vision is depicted behind them (GOA). Sacchi characterizes each monk with individual attributes, an element Sacchi continues in his work to focus upon a select group of figures (GOA). Sacchi exerts a control on the color and tone, blending Baroque and Classical art, compared to the dramatic movements and painterly approach of Cortona (GOA). Sacchi saw the purpose of art as representing serious morals, instead of being purely decorative (GOA). Sacchi’s work represents the reduction to the essential elements of the scene to illustrate the morals of the saint. Sacchi debated with Cortona at the Accademia di S. Luca in 1636 concerning the virtues of compositions containing few or many figures (GOA). Sacchi symbolizes the subtly and reduced side of the High Baroque.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. “Sacchi, Andrea.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T074853. 26 March, 2013.

Andrea Sacchi, Divine Wisdom, 1629-1630, High Baroque, patron: Cardinal Antonio Barberini, fresco, Palazzo Barberini, Rome

Sacchi’s Divine Wisdom continues his use of few figures and reduced composition to represent a moral virtue. The ceiling decoration, part of the Palazzo Barberini’s, was in the antechamber to the private chapel of the family (GOA). The decoration depicts Divine Wisdom and the different qualities, illustrated by the eleven seated women, such as Nobility and Justice (GOA). The allegorical women’s attributes also correspond to a constellation, with some stars (Harris, 121). The allegorical representation does not involve the framing of quadratura architecture, but involves seen from below, the illusion that the ceiling of the room is an open sky (GOA). sirens along each corner holding Barberini suns, while bees, the family symbol, are integrate on the throne and framing frieze (Harris, 121). Sacchi references an apocryphal text in the Barberini archives, in which Divine Wisdom rules the world with the help of divine archers, represented by the winged youths, who move us toward love of wisdom or fear of its absence (Harris, 121). Sacchi individualizes each of the women, referencing the importance he placed upon fewer figures to focus upon individuality. The classical ceiling decoration is above the chapel, reminding the viewer to pray for guidance from Divine Wisdom (Harris, 122). The globe in the scene also references Sacchi’s awareness of contemporary scientific thoughts, such as Galileo’s heliocentric theories, due to his first patron, Cardinal del Monte. The subtle colors and reduced composition represent Sacchi’s characteristic of focusing on a work based on morals and virtues.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. “Sacchi, Andrea.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T074853. 26 March, 2013.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

 

Lea Stephenson: Week 7: The Caravaggisti and Bologna Classicism of the Carracci School

The Caravaggisti

Giovanni Battista Caracciolo, Liberation of St. Peter from Prison, 1609-1615, Early Baroque, patron: governors of the Pio Monte della Misericordia, Baroque, oil on canvas, Church of the Pio Monte della Misericordia, Naples

Giovanni Battista Caracciolo’s (1578-1635) Liberation of St. Peter from Prison represents the adoption of various Caravaggio techniques with a Neapolitan audience. Caravaggio’s impact in Naples led to successive generations into the eighteenth century, combining with local style and outside influences, such as the Carracci School. Neapolitan artists were exposed to Caravaggio’s work during his itinerant period, leading to specific stylistic trends, which reflected his work during the years in Naples, such as The Seven Acts of Mercy, 1607. Caracciolo was included in the first generation of Neapolitan Caravaggisti, ultimately creating a succession of artists who became influenced by Caravaggio. He founded a modern school in Naples, developing students who incorporated Caravaggio’s elements into their style, such as Massimo Stanzione. Caracciolo’s work illustrates the use of Caravaggio’s tenebrism to create a heightened dramatic scene, a technique that was translated to other Neapolitan artists through Caracciolo. Similar to Caravaggio, Caracciolo develops monumental depictions for his ennobled peasant figures, an element of naturalism incorporated by Caravaggio. Caracciolo however utilizes a different form of tenebrism by creating harder forms with the dramatic light. The tightly compacted composition creates a dramatic narrative between the figures, further emphasized by the light hardening the forms and an austere presentation. Caracciolo removes the richness of Caravaggio, but maintains the impenetrable forms and surface. The drama and intensity, developed through light, characterizes Caracciolo as one of the central Neapolitan Caravaggistis during the emerging stylistic trends of the Baroque.

Causa, Stefano. “Caracciolo, Giovanni Battista.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T013921. 5 March 2013.

http://www.iicedimburgo.esteri.it/IIC_Edimburgo/webform/..%5C..%5CIICManager%5CUpload%5CIMG%5C%5CEdimburgo%5CRibera%20silenus%20small.jpg

http://www.iicedimburgo.esteri.it/IIC_Edimburgo/webform/..%5C..%5CIICManager%5CUpload%5CIMG%5C%5CEdimburgo%5CRibera%20silenus%20small.jpg

Jusepe de Ribera, Drunken Silenus, 1626, Baroque, patron: Giacomo de Castro, oil on canvas, 72 7/8 x 90 1/8,” National Museum of Capodimonte, Naples

Jusepe de Ribera’s (1591-1652) Drunken Silenus reflects the relationship between Spain and Naples, along with the influence of Caravaggio towards naturalism. Ribera, though a Spanish artist and termed “Lo Spagnoletto,” worked primarily in Naples, following Caravaggio’s style. Caravaggio’s style would influence various Spanish artists, moving to Naples with Spanish viceroys who were politically in charge. Spanish viceroys would sent art back to Spain, such as the work of Ribera, leading to new directions in Spanish painting with a genre based, sympathetic type of environment. Ribera’s first incorporation of Caravaggio influences included the use of his techniques, such as chiaroscuro, though ultimately supplanted by the Carracci style by the mid-1630s. Ribera probably arrived in Naples in 1616, previously in Rome, and acknowledged for his monumental and complex compositions. Ribera’s work reflects a popular subject, especially a mythological scene that includes Silenus and fauns, along with the god Pan, the father of Silenus (Harris, 210). Ribera became influenced by Caravaggio with his early work, as seen with the use of tenebrism and monochromatic palette in the scene, emphasizing a “vulgar realism,” which derived from the naturalism of Caravaggio (Harris, 211). Compared to his later work, Ribera includes a plainer background, but maintains a use of diagonals to create a dynamic composition, engaging the viewer. The treatment of the mythological subject matter with the extreme realism contrasts with the idealization of figures by Annibale Carracci (Harris, 211). Northern collectors admired Ribera’s realism, since Northern tastes preferred an intense, grotesque realism. Ribera’s work illustrates the dialogue emerging between Spain and Naples, along with his role as a Caravaggisti by propelling an extreme version of Caravaggio’s techniques for subsequent Baroque artists.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Pérez Sánchez, Alfonso E. “Ribera, Jusepe de.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T071858. 5 March 2013.

Jusepe de Ribera, Apollo and Marsyas, 1637, Baroque, oil on canvas, 71.7″ x 91.3,” Museo Nazionale di San Martino, Naples

Ribera’s Apollo and Marsyas reflects his shift from the naturalism and tenebrism of Caravaggio, to a classical style advocated by the Carracci. By 1632, Ribera’s paintings included a lighter palette and loose brushwork (Grove DOA). The scene, a mythological subject matter, depicts the story of Marsyas after winning a contest with Apollo, but flayed by the god. The classical and coloristic style, especially with the treatment of Apollo, represents the Carracci’s influence on Ribera, along with the lighter, classical background and looser brushwork. In his later work, Ribera would increase the emotional effect and identification with suffering and violence, as seen with the subject matter of flaying. With previous artists, the act of flaying would rarely be depicted, but Ribera retains his connection to Caravaggio techniques by including a grotesque, bloody treatment with the revealing of muscles, though a Caravaggio technique pushed to an extreme. Ribera, characteristic in his treatment of flesh, creates a comparison between the two figures with a contrast between classical and naturalistic handling. Apollo, with a classical treatment of flesh, is depicted in a contrapposto stance and considered the ideal body in the classical style, accompanied by the drapery and smooth texture of his skin. In contrast, Marsyas’ flesh reflects a typical depiction of naturalistic flesh, with the wrinkles, fine brushwork detail, similar to Caravaggio’s crude subject matter, but refined technique. Marsyas also illustrates anti-classical elements with the decay of the body. The dual influences of the Carracci School and Caravaggio techniques, become represented in the depiction of the mythological subject matter. Ribera’s work underlines the shift toward the classical, while retaining elements of Caravaggio, a dualism that reflected the two contrasting schools of style during the Baroque.

Pérez Sánchez, Alfonso E. “Ribera, Jusepe de.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T071858. 5 March 2013.

Jusepe de Ribera, St. Andrew, 1635, Baroque, patron: possibly Conde de Monterrey, oil on canvas, 48.4″ x 95,” Museo del Prado

Ribera’s St. Andrew represents his continuing attention to the treatment of flesh, and the emotive portrait types. Spanish art often referenced figural types, along with an appreciation for a painterly approach instead of a hard surface, a technique emerging with Ribera’s work. Series of portraits for different types of themes, such as saints and ancient philosophers, were profitable for artists during the Baroque. Ribera, such as with St. Andrew, could create these smaller portraits in multiples, paint relatively quickly, and be easily transported, relating to the dialogue between Spain and Naples. Ribera’s work focuses upon the reality of flesh, consisting of a more superficial approach to details. Ribera’s later work, such as St. Andrew, illustrates a more internal quality through the treatment of flesh, seen with the sensual surface. Ribera brings humanity to his figures, with the emotive surface and the dramatic lighting. He moves from the humor of his early mythological works to dignity in his treatment of subjects. St. Andrew relates to themes that reflect individuals who would be beneficial for viewers to meditate upon, acting as a means of salvation. Ribera’s work represents the emotional emphasis of the Baroque with the treatment of surface, while engaging the viewer through the means of meditation.

Pérez Sánchez, Alfonso E. “Ribera, Jusepe de.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T071858. 5 March 2013.

Bologna Classicism of the Carracci School

Guido Reni, Massacre of the Innocents, 1611, Baroque, oil on canvas, 106″ x 67,” Pinacoteca Nazionale

Guido Reni’s (1575-1642) Massacre of the Innocents illustrates the influence of the Carracci and the emergence of the classical Baroque style. Reni had the advantage of training with the Carracci, leading to a large amount of patronage. Reni’s work focuses upon the classical style, losing the drama of the chiaroscuro, but instead a concentration upon posing the figures in classical gestures and facial expressions. Reni centers upon the narrative qualities, telling a dramatic story through emotions and rhetorical relationships of the figures. During the seventeenth century, a system developed for the treatment of facial expressions, leading to a studied approach of reading instead of feeling. The massacre of the children includes a variety of expressions, but does not have the same degree of violence as Caravaggio. Reni considers a more intellectual approach to the subject matter, staged with gestures and relationships. The inclusion of these expressions follows the Carracci School classicism, as Reni retains a recession into the distance with architectural elements and staffage to calculate the proportional distance between front and back. Reni utilizes a classical frieze composition across the front, but with a Baroque depth. Reni is conscious of the relationships between figures, creating opposing forces and figures coming out of the picture plane, a Baroque element of engaging the viewer. However, Reni creates a frozen moment presented with classical qualities, removed from the emotional, but aligning with the Carracci School principles of classicism.

Guido Reni, Aurora, 1614, Baroque, patron: Cardinal Scipione Borghese, fresco, Casino Pallavicini Rospigliosi, Rome

Reni’s Aurora illustrates classicism, as Reni became leader of the Carracci School. Cardinal Scipione Borghese commissioned the ceiling fresco for his summer house, depicting Apollo’s chariot led by dawn, Aurora, a classical subject matter. Reni utilizes quadro riportato, not breaking with the tradition established by Michelangelo and followed by Annibale Carracci. The subject matter of Aurora also refers to Annibale and Raphael’s work, as Reni wants the viewer to recall these examples, thus creating a connection with masters. Reni includes a perspective into the far distance to maintain depth. The classical tradition is seen with the treatment of the figures, as Reni studied antique sculptures for models, a Carracci School principal of observation (Harris, 66). Reni represents idealized bodies, part of the notion of classical form, while establishing a new, predominant style in Rome. The classicism, whether with the idealized figures, colore treatment, or subject matter, continues elements of the Carracci.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Spear, Richard E. “Reni, Guido.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press, 3 Jan. 2005. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T071466. 5 March 2013.

Guido Reni, David with Head of Goliath, c. 1605, Baroque, oil on canvas, 87″ x 63,” Louvre, Paris

Reni’s David with Head of Goliath represents the shift away from the techniques of Caravaggio for the classical approach of the Carracci School. Reni takes on the subject matter with a fantastical approach, removed from the intense drama of the event. He emphasizes the classical tradition, placing classical architecture on either side of David, while using a classical pose. David is pulled out of the narrative moment, and becomes positioned as a theatrical figure. When compared to Caravaggio’s version, Reni’s David with Head of Goliath lacks the tragic quality and intense realism, but carries a different emotional weight as David displays Goliath’s head as a trophy. Reni continues to utilize classical references as a leader of the Carracci School, contrasting with the previous work of Caravaggio and the dramatic naturalism.

Guido Reni, Cleopatra, 1638-1639, Baroque, oil on canvas, 48″ x 38,” Palazzo Pitti, Florence

Reni’s Cleopatra depicts the use of classical gestures as a connection to the Carracci School. Reni’s commercial success included completing multiple canvases of allegories of the virtues. These series, such as Cleopatra, was admired for the expressions, consisting of staged countenances and rhetorical gestures that became associated with specific meanings, affetti. The affetti, which included books on the subject during the Baroque, derived from classical antiquity. Reni was successful for the treatment of materials, contrasting with the creamy, opalescent skin. He continues to study classical sources, leading to an idealization of forms and the depiction of allegories. Reni serves as an example of the predominant classical influence on the Carracci School, an emerging style during the Baroque.

Lea Stephenson: Week 6: The Carracci; “Caravaggisti”

The Carracci

The Carracci Family, Story of Jason, Palazzo Fava, 1583-1584, Early Baroque, patron: Fava family, fresco, Palazzo Fava, Bologna

The Carracci family’s collaborative project of the Palazzo Fava represents the pursuit of illusionism, leading to the Baroque principle of truth to nature. The Palazzo Fava in Bologna was undertaken by the Carracci family, consisting of Ludovico, Agostino, and Annibale, and illustrating the unity and singularity in their styles during the early years of the family’s career. The monumental frieze decoration of several rooms in the Palazzo Fava, including the Story of Jason, consisted of eighteen narrative scenes in a cycle, connected in the illusionistic treatment of framing elements. Many early Baroque artists, like the Carracci family, wanted to adopt the qualities associated with Renaissance masters, such as Michelangelo and Raphael, but along with directly quoting specific figures, artists utilized the masters’ attitudes toward representation. The use of the fictive framing system, with a focus upon illusionism, derives from Michelangelo. The Carracci employed the style of quadro riportato, in which paintings are illusionistically placed elsewhere. The illusionistic system of stone figures framing scenes also derived from Michelangelo’s work at the Sistine Chapel, as the viewer looks up toward the depicted figures, as if physical statues. Michelangelo’s technique of ignudi, figures that appear life-like and used by the Carracci, represented Baroque artists’ concern with the viewer and space, as the life-like figures would remain in the world of the viewer, while representations in the realm of painting. The left sculptural figure in the Story of Jason detail is a reference to Michelangelo’s Bacchus, a modern work replicating the antique, illustrating how the Carracci were aware of work outside of Bologna. According to Giovanni Agucchi, the Carracci became a representation of the classical style of selective nature, however, the Carracci’s aim was to combine colore and disegno. With this combination, the Carracci’s goal was to achieve verisimilitude, truth to nature, echoed in the focus upon illusionism in the decorations of the Palazzo Fava. The pursuit of verisimilitude also referenced the philosophical belief of a higher reality, il vero, as by representing nature, one could reach a higher Truth, a notion that separates the Carracci from the naturalism of Caravaggio. As seen with the decoration at the Palazzo Fava, the Carracci formulated compositions through the manipulation of color and light to maintain balance. The development of illusionism was accompanied with the Carracci’s construction of classical compositions, as seen with the frieze decoration. The Story of Jason scene is organized in planes, since during the Baroque there were new scientific ideas about space and time. The planes are united through the composition, but through a diagonal device to create balance, along with an atmospheric perspective to establish a unity. The figures going back into space, along with the use of sculptural figures, emphasized the Carracci aim of developing illusionism, a Baroque approach to naturalism.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Ludovico Carracci, Vision of St. Francis, 1583-86, Early Baroque, oil on canvas, 41″ x 40,” Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam

Ludovico Carracci’s Vision of St. Francis illustrates the development of depicting nature. Ludovico in the work represents an interest in an affective piety, such as the relationship with St. Francis and the Child, similar to the emotional resonance achieved by Barrocci’s figures. St. Francis and the Child serve as the axis of the composition, which then continues into the distance through the use of diagonals, a technique of the Carracci. In the scene, Ludovico attempts to balance the depiction of reality, or nature, with the mystical vision. The Virgin is surrounded by clouds and light, also the only element in the painting depicted with primary color, while reality, St. Francis, is depicted in monochrome tones. Ludovico unites the disegno of diagonals, while also utilizing colore to represent a vision more real than reality. He observes nature to give form to humanity and spiritual representation, ultimately achieving verisimilitude through the combination of disegno and colore (Grove DOA). Ludovico attempts to achieve a method of representing the spiritual and symbolic level through natural means, a process many Baroque artists shared. The naturalism of the religious scenes related to the Counter-Reformation, focusing upon works that displays truth to common experience and inspire the faithful (Grove DOA). Ludovico’s work continues the Baroque characteristic of depicting the spiritual for a Counter-Reformation audience.

Van Tuyll van Serooskerken, C., et al. “Carracci.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com/subscriber/article/grove/art/T014340. 19 February 2013.

Agostino Carracci, Last Communion of St. Jerome, c. 1590s, Early Baroque, patron: Carthusian monastery, Bologna, oil on canvas, 12′ 4″ x 7′ 4,” Pinacoteca Nazionale, Bologna

Agostino Carracci’s Last Communion of St. Jerome portrays the Baroque focus upon earthly and heavenly realms to communicate Counter-Reformation principles. The work was part of the renovation and decoration of Certosa di San Girolamo outside of Bologna. The painting illustrates the decrees coming from the Council of Trent, concerned with defending the main tenets of the Church and rituals. The principles communicated by the work related to Cardinal Gabriele Paleotti, in Bologna, who professed attacks on the decorum of images, providing guidelines after the Council of Trent to decree what was proper in sacred settings, while promoting clarity of the subject for a didactic role of images. Agostino represents St. Jerome taking the sacrament, in the aesthetic saint’s body, while depicted among symbol connoting the saint, such as the meditation skull and his lion. Monks hold some of the elements of the office of the sacrament, relating to the didactic tool of painting during the Counter-Reformation since the apocryphal legend of St. Jerome recounts the saint receiving his last communion on his knees to represent his humility before Christ (Harris, 19). The frieze of figures in the composition includes a monumental, architectural framework, with a landscape view beyond (Harris, 19). The putti represent a connection between the earthly and heavenly realm, observed by monks on the left, who consider the location of the soul of the saint. Similar to many Baroque artists, Agostino was interested in creating a bridge between the earthly and heavenly realms to inspire the faithful. The development of new monumental altarpieces was completed through a series of preparatory processes, contributing to the strong sense of design in Carracci compositions. Ludovico’s work, also representing his observation of nature to achieve a realistic representation, communicates the Baroque aim of involving coextensive spaces for the viewer, such as the heavenly and earthly realms.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Van Tuyll van Serooskerken, C., et al. “Carracci.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com/subscriber/article/grove/art/T014340. 19 February 2013.

Annibale Carracci, San Ludovico Altarpiece, c. 1588, Early Baroque, oil on canvas, Pinacoteca Nazionale, Bologna

Annibale Carracci’s San Ludovico Altarpiece represents the continuing influence of Renaissance masters and the Counter-Reformation. The composition suggests the study of Titian and Raphael, especially after Annibale’s work changed quickly after traveling to Venice. Annibale is able to use a glazing technique, in addition to a strong understructure that relates to disegno, and glowing layers of color, emphasizing again the combination of disegno and colore emphasized by the Carracci. The composition continues the Baroque aim of creating a connection between different realms, but for Caravaggio, between the figure and viewer. The Carracci were interested in unifying realms, between earthly and heavenly realms of painting. The unification of realms related to Counter-Reformation doctrines of inspiring the faithful through a straightforward manner of painting. The figures, predominantly in the frontal plane, are framed by architecture. Annibale continues the technique of using diagonals, as seen with the gestures of figures, varying in direction. The indexical figures become part of the rhetorical effort on the part of the composition, such the main figures, St. Ludovico, bishop saint, and the Virgin and Child on the clouds. Annibale’s preparatory studies for the altarpiece reflects the arched monumental frame created by the architecture, also mirroring the frame created by the altarpiece with the lunette top. Annibale emphasize illusion, therefore when the viewer looked at the altarpiece through the archway, there was continuity between the actual and the represented, stressing the heavenly and earthly realms, while making a connection to the realm of the viewer with the gesture of St. John the Baptist. Annibale through his figures and compositional frames aims to connect the viewer to the spiritual scene, a Counter-Reformation principle.

Annibale Carracci, Pietà, c. 1599-1600, Early Baroque, patron: possibly commissioned by Cardinal Odoardo Farnese, oil on canvas, 5′ 1 3/8″ x 4′ 10 5/8,” National Museum of Capodimonte, Naples

Annibale Carracci’s Pietà continued his classicism with the achieved sculptural effect. The work was possibly made for a chapel in the Palazzo Farnese at Caprarola. Christ is draped over Mary’s lap, as she gestures toward the viewer to direct attention to the event (Harris, 31). The sculptural effect created by the figures, references Michelangelo, with a new classicism that returns to Renaissance masters. Annibale was admired for the horizontal compositional form, and the expressive quality of the interaction between the figures, such as his ability to give moving and emotive qualities through subtle gestures. Annibale continues naturalism based on the direct observation of nature, to give human form to classical or sculptural figures. He approaches the religious scene with a reductive nature to the environment, along with an atmospheric quality relating to the influence of Correggio. The tomb slab, an element seen in Caravaggio’s work, points toward the viewer and develops a connection. Carracci also makes playful allusion to the Passion of the Christ, seen with the angels, as one holds the hand of Christ, turning toward the other angel who pricks his fingers on the thorns, looking at the viewer. The work reflects the continuation of classicism with the use of sculptural figures, while representing the emotive qualities achieved by Baroque artists.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

The “Caravaggisti”

Orazio Gentileschi, St. Cecilia Altarpiece, n.d., Early Baroque, oil on canvas, Pinacoteca di Brera, Milan

Orazio Gentileschi’s (1563-1639) St. Cecilia Altarpiece illustrates the influence of Caravaggio’s techniques upon Baroque artists, such as tenebrism. Orazio is included in the first generation of contemporaries influenced by Caravaggio, working in Rome during the same period. In Rome, public works of Caravaggio were available to artists, leading to many, like Orazio, using multi-figure compositions, full-scale, and tenebrist atmospheric treatment. Orazio as an early follower of Caravaggio took up his style to stay current. In St. Cecilia Altarpiece, Orazio incorporates tenebrist qualities, as seen with the dramatic lighting derived from Caravaggio. However, compared to the vague, dark backgrounds of Caravaggio, Orazio places the religious scene in a specific setting. Orazio adopted various Caravaggio techniques of lighting and figural composition, but he maintained his use of color. The altarpiece utilizes elements of naturalism, such as the direct observation of nature in the treatment of the angel’s wings to create a straightforward depiction of a religious scene for the faithful. Orazio represents one of the various “Caravaggisti” adopting the techniques of Caravaggio, combined with their own personal elements. The dramatic lighting in the scene, such as the light highlighting the arm of St. Cecilia, derives from religious scenes of Caravaggio, however, Orazio maintains his graceful treatment of form and drapery, achieving clarity in his use of color.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Harris, Ann Sutherland and, Judith W. Mann. “Gentileschi.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T031374pg1. 26 February 2013.

Orazio Gentileschi, St. Cecilia and the Angel, c. 1617/1618 and c. 1621/1627, Early Baroque, oil on canvas, 34 7/16″ x 42 1/2,” National Gallery of Art, Washington D.C.

Orazio Gentileschi’s St. Cecilia and the Angel illustrates the continuing influence of Caravaggio upon Roman artists, specifically with the use of light to represent the Baroque attention to drama. The work involves the use of chiaroscuro to focus upon the religious figures set against a Caravaggio nondescript background. The foreshortening of the instrument, accompanied with the lighting, creates a dramatic impact. The drama, emphasized by Orazio with his use of Caravaggio techniques, derives from the Baroque naturalism of light, such as a divine illumination spurred by the angel in the scene. The naturalism of Caravaggio continues with Orazio, such as the intense observation of life to achieve the dramatic, contemplative moment (Grove DOA). Instead of the emotional, Orazio emphasizes the rational with the use of color and treatment of form, shifting from the controversial quality of Caravaggio’s works. The Baroque naturalism to achieve drama is attained by Orazio’s adaptation of Caravaggio techniques.

Harris, Ann Sutherland and, Judith W. Mann. “Gentileschi.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T031374pg1. 26 February 2013.

Martin, John Rupert. Baroque. New York: Harper & Row. 1977.

Bartolomeo Manfredi, Bacchus and a Drinker, 1600-10, Early Baroque, oil on canvas, 52″ x 38,” Galleria Nazionale d’Arte Antica, Rome

Bartolomeo Manfredi’s (1582-1622) Bacchus and a Drinker relates to the influence of Caravaggio’s early works upon the Caravaggisti. Manfredi also takes up the style of Caravaggio, possibly his closest imitator in Rome. Manfredi’s Bacchus and a Drinker adopts the use of ordinary-looking models to achieve a direct naturalism. The use of chiaroscuro and foreshortening in the scene echoes Caravaggio’s work, as the dramatic lighting intensifies the moment, while the foreshortening begins to include the viewer into the coextensive space. The raking light and dark background wall are direct quotes from Caravaggio works, representing Manfredi’s knowledge of his techniques (Grove DOA). The nondescript background allows the viewer to focus primarily upon the genre scene of Bacchus, represented as a heavy drinker with the red nose. As a Caravaggio follower, Manfredi would reinterpret Caravaggio’s subjects, while using his naturalism and dramatic chiaroscuro. Northern followers of Caravaggio would offer a coarser treatment of street subjects which Caravaggio had made popular, leading to an expansion in this genre, as seen with the figure accompanying Bacchus. Manfredi focused upon choosing Caravaggio’s early period subjects, such as allegories, mythologies, and genre scenes (Grove DOA).  Manfredi utilized techniques of light and choice of subject matter popularized by Caravaggio.

Chvostai, John J. “Manfredi, Bartolomeo.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T053775. 26 February 2013.

Bartolomeo Manfredi, Mars Punishes Love, 1613, Early Baroque, oil on canvas, 69″ x 51 3/8,” The Art Institute of Chicago

Bartolomeo Manfredi’s Mars Punishes Love represents the combination of Caravaggio traits from various periods to create a dramatic moment. The work portrays an allegorical subject matter, specifically classical, a topic depicted by Caravaggio in his early period (Grove DOA). However, Manfredi blends the early subject matter with the style of Caravaggio’s later period, a characteristic often seen with followers. The genre subject becomes combined with tenebrism, as seen with the classical scene of the dramatic illumination upon the figures against a nondescript background. The strong chiaroscuro creates sharply defined forms, referencing Manfredi’s abilities to master Caravaggio’s technique (Grove DOA). Manfredi illustrates the dramatic moment of Mars punishing Love, further accentuated by the raking light across Mars and the illumination of Love. Manfredi also adopts the Caravaggio technique of placing elements against the picture plane, pushing the realm of painting closer to the viewer. The use of Caravaggio techniques ultimately reinforces the Baroque naturalism to create the dramatic moment.

Chvostai, John J. “Manfredi, Bartolomeo.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T053775. 26 February 2013.

Artemisia Gentileschi, Judith Slaying Holofernes, 1611-1612, Early Baroque, oil on canvas, 63″ x 50,” Museo Nazionale di Capodimonte, Naples

Artemisia Gentileschi’s (1593-1654) Judith Slaying Holofernes uses dramatic lighting to illuminate the decisive moment of the scene, a technique of Caravaggio. Artemisia, the daughter of Orazio Gentileschi, assisted her father in the studio, leading to her development as a female artist (Harris, 52). The work, one of two pictures depicting Judith decapitating Holofernes, references Caravaggio’s own painting portraying the Biblical scene (Harris, 53). The Biblical story was popular during the early seventeenth century, as early Baroque artists referenced war and martyrdom (Grove DOA). Artemisia’s choice of subject also possibly references a form of “visual revenge” after her rape in Rome (Grove DOA). Judith and her servant overpower and murder the Assyrian general, Holofernes. Artemisia emphasizes the naturalism of the decapitation, a technique of Caravaggio with the visual realism. She also utilizes Caravaggio’s dark setting for her scene, while still utilizing the color to create a dramatic impact (Harris, 53). The “flashes of light” on the figures in the front plane reinforce the decisive moment of the scene to create a dramatic visual for the viewer (Harris, 53).

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Harris, Ann Sutherland and, Judith W. Mann. “Gentileschi.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T031374pg1. 26 February 2013.

 

Lea Stephenson: Week 5: The Carracci Reform of Painting

Ludovico Carracci, Allegory of Poetry Comforting Painting

Ludovico Carracci, Allegory of Poetry Comforting Painting, n.d., Early Baroque, ink and wash sketch

Ludovico Carracci’s (1555-1619) Allegory of Poetry Comforting Painting represents the Carracci’s formation of an academy, ultimately causing their classical style to spread to various artists. In 1582, the Carracci founded an academy, Accademia del Disegno, in Bologna. The Academy became established through the traditional idea of the family workshop, including Ludovico, Agostino, and Annibale. The program consisted of drawing, disegno, along with the study of optics, scientific subjects, and perspective. The allegory behind the sketch represents the type of subject matter within the curriculum of the Academy, with a basis of copying and drawing from life. The classical subject matter of the sketch would become a foundation for artists emerging out of the Academy, thus perpetuating over several generations with the shared ideas of style from the originators of the Academy. The sketch illustrates the reintroduction of the classical style by the Carracci, and the effect of their Academy.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Agostino Carracci, Portrait of Titian (engraving after)

Agostino Carracci, Portrait of Titian (engraving after), 1587, Early Baroque, copperplate engraving, 12.87″ x 9.29″

Agostino Carracci’s (1557-1602) Portrait of Titian (engraving after) illustrates the perpetuation of the Carracci style through prints. The Carracci family would use reproducible mediums to advance their style and earn money. Agostino, the most adept in printmaking, would create prints after famous Renaissance artists. With the ability to reproduce prints, the Carracci were able to spread their philosophy and compositions widely, compared to an original work. The engraving of the portrait of Titian represents the Carracci’s study of northern Renaissance masters, specifically the influence of Correggio, Titian, and Veronese (Grove DOA). By originating in Bologna, the Carracci became heavily influence by north Italian naturalism and colore (Grove DOA). The Carracci studied Titian’s work for his ability in color, combining colore with the figural power of Michelangelo, along with the grace of Raphael. The style emerging from the Carracci sought to harmonize the principles of these various masters. The engraving of Titian’s portrait is an example of copying work, often showing how one can surpass the original. The painting of Titian is transformed to a medium of black and white, but Agostino continues to suggest distinctions of color through the ability of drawing, such as texture, ultimately comparing himself to the masters. The engravings, specifically the work of Agostino, led to the spread of the Carracci style, and its formation of the Baroque.

Dempsey, Charles. The Age of Correggio and the Carracci: Emilian Painting of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Washington, D.C.: National Gallery of Art, 1986.

Van Tuyll van Serooskerken, C., et al. “Carracci.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com/subscriber/article/grove/art/T014340. 19 February 2013.

Ludovico Carracci, Madonna dei Bargellini

Ludovico Carracci, Madonna dei Bargellini, 1587, Early Baroque, patron: Bargellini family, oil on canvas, 9′ 3″ x 6′ 2,” Pinacoteca Nazionale, Bologna

Ludovico Carracci’s Madonna dei Bargellini portrays the north Italian influence of naturalism upon the Carracci, especially with human sentiment. The work was inspired by the “airy” altarpieces of the Venetians, especially Titian and Veronese (Grove DOA). Ludovico depicts a humanity with the expressions, which becomes characteristic of his figural style (Grove DOA). In opposition to Mannerism, Ludovico and his family members became inspired by north Italian naturalism and colore. The Carracci ultimately wanted to combine truth to nature, reaching the viewer’s sentiments (Grove DOA). The Carracci aim of utilizing verisimilitude for a truthful expression related to the Baroque style of naturalism, ultimately aiding the Counter-Reformation in depicting religious scenes with a new immediacy and truth for the faithful. Ludovico’s naturalistic approach to the Madonna scene also relates to the Carracci style of giving form to an idealized view of the world, while still studying nature (Grove DOA). Ludovico uses the composition of Titian’s Pesaro Altarpiece, 1519-1526, with a new viewer relationship to the Madonna, the throne shifted (Harris, 11). The Madonna is on the right, while the two columns on the left symbolize the “gateway to heaven” (Harris, 12). The Madonna also represents the emerging representation of human sentiment, as she looks down upon the viewer, Christ in her protective arms, gazing at St. Francis and the kneeling donor in the foreground (Harris, 12). The towers of Bologna appear in the distance, illustrating the Counter-Reformation practice of destroying the barrier between natural and supernatural worlds for the faithful (Held, 74). Ludovico’s work represents the naturalism of studying nature to give form to humanity and idealized representations.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Held, Julius S. and Posner, Donald. 17th and 18th Century Art: Baroque, Painting, Sculpture, Architecture. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc. 1971.

Van Tuyll van Serooskerken, C., et al. “Carracci.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com/subscriber/article/grove/art/T014340. 19 February 2013.

Ludovico Carracci, The Conversion of St. Paul

Ludovico Carracci, The Conversion of St. Paul, 1587-89, Early Baroque, patron: Zambeccari family, oil on canvas, 110 x 67 3/8,” Pinacoteca Nazionale, Bologna

Ludovico Carracci’s The Conversion of St. Paul illustrates the dramatic moment depicted during the Baroque, and the Carracci style contrasting with the previous Mannerism. The work was created for the Zambeccari family chapel in San Francesco, while being inspired by Michelangelo’s fresco in the Pauline Chapel in the Vatican, with the saint on the ground (Harris, 14). Ludovico represents the dramatic impact when Saul is greeted with a vision. Saul is in the central foreground, as his limbs are in the light, wearing the only garment of strong color. As Saul looks toward the vision, a counter-diagonal is created with his eyes looking up to the sky (Harris, 14). An X marks the main lines of the composition, emphasizing a clarity and drama which contrasts with the previous crowded compositions of Mannerism (Harris, 14). Ludovico also illustrates the differing methods of representing divine presences that cannot be seen, as Ludovico makes an ineffable presence in the clouds through light, an emerging idea as artists were not completely satisfied with making spiritual figures completely human. Ludovico, similar to many Baroque artists, utilizes light as an element to indicate illumination, for Saul, and spirituality. The dramatic moment of conversion is emphasized by the bold chiaroscuro, which is typical of Ludovico’s work (Harris, 14-15). The work illustrates Ludovico’s shift toward clarity and the naturalism emerging with himself and his family members in reaction to Mannerism.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Annibale Carracci, Crucifixion with Virgin and Saints

Annibale Carracci, Crucifixion with Virgin and Saints, 1583, Early Baroque, oil on canvas, 83″ x 120,” for S.M. di S. Felice, now S.M. della Carità

Annibale Carracci’s (1560-1609) Crucifixion with Virgin and Saints represents the naturalism emerging from the Carracci, as expressed through northern Italian techniques. The painting was Annibale’s first major religious work when he was twenty-three years-old. Six figures, including the Virgin and the Saints, are gathered symmetrically, around the crucifix. Annibale depicts his figures with a naturalism, differing from the artifice of Mannerism (Grove DOA). The work includes Annibale’s early technique of using a coarse application of paint, derived from a Venetian painting influence (Grove DOA). The painting technique, characterized as ‘informal,’ was a new form of representing religious work (Grove DOA). Annibale, with his family members, opposed Mannerism, leading them to adopt north Italian naturalism and colore. Annibale working in Bologna aligns to Cardinal Gabriele Paleotti, from Bologna, who was writing on art’s use for the Counter-Reformation, during the Council of Trent (Drogin and Harris). The straightforward manner, along with the dramatic poses and expressions for clarity, connects to the Counter-Reformation aim of teaching the faithful, addressed by Annibale with naturalism.

Drogin, David, and Harris, Beth. “Carracci’s Crucifixion & Lamentation.” Smarthistory. KhanAcademy. http://smarthistory.khanacademy.org/carracci-crucifixion-and-lamentation.html. 19 February 2013.

Van Tuyll van Serooskerken, C., et al. “Carracci.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com/subscriber/article/grove/art/T014340. 19 February 2013.

Annibale Carracci, Venus Adorned by the Graces

Annibale Carracci, Venus Adorned by the Graces, 1590/1595, Early Baroque, oil on panel transferred to canvas, 52 3/8″ x 67 1/8,” National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.

Annibale Carracci’s Venus Adorned by the Graces represents the rise of classicism, as developed by Annibale. Annibale, with his family members, continued to combine the painterly effects and color of Venetian artists, a Lombard naturalism, but accompanied with Italian design (Grove DOA). The scene of Venus and the Graces consist of gestures relating to idealized, classical figures. Though the figures are idealized and based upon mythology, the Carracci addressed classicism with naturalism (Grove DOA). The Carracci, such as in this work, reintroduce the classical style, but through a naturalistic approach to classical sculpture, as human beings are depicted through observation, instead of statues. The viewer would be able to accept the reality of the scene through the natural human forms, though an idealization (Grove DOA). The Carracci approach to naturalism contrasts with Caravaggio’s style, as the Carracci use naturalism to achieve a reality behind classicism.

Van Tuyll van Serooskerken, C., et al. “Carracci.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com/subscriber/article/grove/art/T014340. 19 February 2013.

Annibale Carracci, Galleria Farnese

Annibale Carracci, (ceiling with Agostino; walls with assistants, including Domenichino, Giovanni Lanfranco) Galleria Farnese, 1595-1600, Early Baroque, patron: Cardinal Odoardo Farnese, Palazzo Farnese, Rome

Annibale Carracci’s Galleria Farnese represents the emergence of classicism, but relying upon the depiction of nature to bring the mythological scenes to a reality. Annibale moved to Rome in 1595 from Bologna with Agostino, commissioned by Cardinal Odoardo Farnese to complete scenes in the Palazzo Farnese, commemorating the deeds of the Cardinal’s father, Duke Alessandro Farnese. The cycle of frescoes however would involve mythological scenes, beginning with the Camerino. The Galleria uses sources from antiquity, illustrating the classical influence still prevalent during the Baroque. Annibale’s Galleria reflects the principles of Roman classicism, figures taken from classical Rome and imbued with naturalism. The Galleria, a barrel vault, includes framed paintings of different sizes, quadri riportati. The quadri riportati, or “transported painting,” are paintings that seem to have been moved from one place and placed somewhere else (Minor, 26). The mythological scenes reflect a theme of love, while also reflecting the antique statues in the Farnese collection (Grove DOA). The Galleria consists of a large rectangular scene in the center, and two smaller rectangular pictures at the top and bottom, creating an arch, along with a frieze just above the cornice (Harris, 27-28). The rectangular scene in the center, Triumph of Bacchus, illustrates the theme of love, accompanied with various narrative scenes. The Galleria relies upon the use of illusion, such as the appearance of architecture, the projection into space, and the integration of statues supporting scenes. Annibale involves a “fictitious reality,” mixing the real world, with integration of ignudi and putti as if part of the viewer’s world, which contrasts with the mythological figures (Grove DOA). Loggia of Psyche by Raphael and Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel ceiling influenced Annibale with ceiling design (Harris, 27). The Galleria achieves a classicism and idealization, while involving the naturalistic approach to the mythological figures, an emerging style of the Baroque, begun by the Carracci.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Minor, Vernon Hyde. Baroque & Rococo: Art & Culture. New York: Harry N. Arams, Inc., Publishers. 1999.

Van Tuyll van Serooskerken, C., et al. “Carracci.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com/subscriber/article/grove/art/T014340. 19 February 2013.

Annibale Carracci, River Landscape

Annibale Carracci, River Landscape, c. 1590, Early Baroque, oil on canvas, 34 3/4″ x 58 5/6,” National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.

Annibale Carracci’s River Landscape demonstrates the emergence of landscape painting as an elevated art form during the Baroque. With the new empiricism, the previously low status of landscape painting was raised (Martin, 60). In the work, Carracci records a direct observation of nature, creating a balance composition with the receding and projecting forms of the land (NGA). The observation of nature contrasted with the previous Mannerist artificiality, as the reliance upon nature related to the principles of the Carracci. Classical landscape emerged with Annibale Carracci’s new treatment of the composition. Small-scale figures were placed in a large natural setting, such as the boatman in relation to the larger, river landscape. Man is no longer the focus upon the painting, but the natural environment is given attention (Martin, 60). For Carracci, he creates an ideal nature, though still relying upon direct observation, instead of artificiality. Carracci elevates landscape painting during the Baroque, in relation to the emerging scientific advancements and the developing focus upon naturalism.

Martin, John Rupert. Baroque. New York: Harper & Row. 1977.

National Gallery of Art. “River Landscape.” Collection. National Gallery of Art, 2013. http://www.nga.gov/fcgi-bin/tinfo_f?object=41673. 19 February 2013.

Lea Stephenson: Week 5-6: Barocci, Caravaggio, Caracci

Barocci’s Pastel Drawings

Federico Barocci, Study for the Madonna, c. 1574, Late Mannerist-Early Baroque, pencil, charcoal, and pastels on paper, 9.69″ x 7.64,” Uffizi, Florence

Barocci integrated the multi-color pastel drawing in his work process, to consider how color helps construct form into the Roman disegno mentality. As Barocci originated outside of Rome, he combined the colore of Correggio and Titian, with the studio emphasis upon disegno in Rome, ultimately using color to align with the structure of drawing. The use of color also becomes a device to create an emotional resonance in the compositions, as the pastel drawings lead to the range of tones in his large scale works. In the pastel drawing, Barocci utilizes the medium tone with the paper left in reserve, a middle tone for highlights and shadows (Grove DOA). The drawing also involves color and the tone of the paper in the development of the visible skin and facial expression. The studies completed in pastel drawings could be applied to figures in larger compositions, creating an emotional resonance due to the observation of expression. Pastel drawing emerges as a medium to observe, ultimately leading to the emphasis upon emotion and naturalism during the Baroque.

Pillsbury, Edmund P. “Barocci, Federico.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press, 31 March, 2000. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T006432. 11 February, 2013.

Barocci’s Visitation and Presentation

Federico Barocci, The Visitation, 1583-86, Late Mannerist-Early Baroque, oil on canvas, Chiesa Nuova, Rome

Barocci’s The Visitation represents the artist continuing to develop an emotional resonance for his works through color, developing the emerging Baroque. Visitation was one of two altarpieces for the side chapel of Chiesa Nuova, while Barocci was one of the most important figures for painting altarpieces during the period. The altarpiece departs from his previous Deposition style of an academic approach, but instead follows the period of the Counter-Reformation with a mystical connection to spirituality. Contemporaries of Barocci described his work as raffinato, combining refinement and sensuality with the use of color. In the Visitation, Barocci uses a color scheme to create an emotional impact, such as employing juxtapositions of different color, and an iridescent quality, as seen with the yellow fabric and color hierarchy. The emotional relationship between the figures is emphasized by the color blocks tying the composition together. The red and yellow fabric blocks forms diagonals. Barocci also opens up the space in the back, a northern Italian influence, as the reality is implied by the extension of the perspectival system. Accompanied with the open space, Barocci depicts framing figures, a common device in painting. One figure, the woman wearing the yellow fabric, maintains the same position as the viewer, looking in on the scene, while another figure moves out of the composition to connect to the audience, though a device not as extreme in the Visitation. Barocci shifts from Mannerist art’s single planar surface, and develops depth with color emitting emotion and figures drawing the viewer into the work.

Barocci, Presentation of the Virgin at the Temple, 1594-1604, Late Mannerist-Early Baroque, oil on canvas, 12′ 6″ x 8′ 1,” Chiesa Nuova, Rome

Barocci’s Presentation of the Virgin at the Temple represents an emerging Baroque naturalism and emotion regarding the figures. The work depicts a young Mary kneeling before the priest as he sprinkles holy water on her. The scene includes Mary’s parents watching her to the left and country folk in the foreground. The empty steps in the center lead the viewer’s eye to Mary and the priest, also emphasized by the pose of the young man holding the ram (Harris, 21). Barocci continues the contours and tonal transitions, influenced by Correggio, to create an emotional resonance (Harris, 21). Mary serves as a symbol of model behavior for children, as emulation is reached by emotion rather than intellect, emphasized in the painting techniques of color. The figures face toward the audience and away, which develops the Baroque naturalism of involving the viewer into the space. The continuation of the vaults, influenced by Raphael, creates a perspectival depth, as flying angels are also included in the scene to depict an atmospheric quality. Barocci continues his attention to color transitions to illustrate emotion, while beginning to involve the viewer in his composition.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Barocci’s Saints

Federico Barocci, St. Jerome, c. 1598, Late Mannerist-Early Baroque, oil on canvas, oil on canvas, Galleria Borghese, Rome

Barocci’s St. Jerome relates to the Baroque interest in the mystical experience. Barocci’s smaller works include series of series of saints for clients who wanted personal, devotional paintings. The function of the work connected to Barocci’s interest in making a painting lead to a spiritual experience. After the Counter-Reformation, St. Jerome and St. Francis were often represented, relating to the end of the sixteenth-century’s interest in an increased mystical experience. In St. Jerome, Barocci represents elements of the natural world, enhancing the depiction of the saint and displaying his own skills as an artist. Light, a natural element, seen with the lantern, moon, and light from the crucifix, illustrates Barocci’s virtuoso of skill. Light also serves as a representation of a divine presence, as the spiritual object, the crucifix, emanates light. Barocci examines the different qualities of light from the various sources, connecting to his observation of facial expressions to create a realistic depiction. The hourglass beside the crucifix represents transience, while showing Barocci’s ability to paint glass and emphasize illusionism with the refined surface, a Baroque characteristic of the illusion of reality. Barocci also returns to his use of color for emotional resonance, while illustrating his ability to combine painterly quality, colore, with graphic quality, disegno. With this combination, Barocci’s brushstrokes become visible due to his training originating outside of Rome. The observation of emotions continues with St. Jerome’s proximity to the crucifix, as his focused gaze creates a relationship between the body of Christ and the saint. St. Jerome sheds a tear, a mastery of the artist, while accompanying the flush ears and red mouth to represent a heightened, emotional state. Barocci’s St. Jerome demonstrates an attention to emotion that would lead to a Baroque period style.

Federico Barocci, St. Francis Receiving the Stigmata, 1594-95, Late Mannerist-Early Baroque (uncertain of location)

Barocci’s St. Francis Receiving the Stigmata represents the use of color and line to create an emotional resonance. Contrasting with St. Jerome and intense focus, St. Francis corresponds to a joyous experience, serving as an altra-Christi. His pose represents the meditative position the faithful are meant to emulate when taking on the life of Christ. With St. Francis, he receives the wounds of Christ, leading to a consideration of representing a divine presence, as Barocci illustrates the wounds through a heavenly figure. Barocci’s use of color, such as the monochromatic earth tones, causes points of color, the iridescent robes, to push forward to the viewer. St. Francis’s hands, one off into depth, while the other comes toward the viewer, causing the faithful to focus upon the stigmata. The work combines the depth of color and line with the foreshortening of the hand, communicating a divine experience.

Pillsbury, Edmund P. “Barocci, Federico.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press, 31 March, 2000. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T006432. 11 February, 2013.

Caravaggio’s Late Works

Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio, The Flagellation of Christ, 1607-10, Early Baroque, Patron: Tommaso De Franchis, oil on canvas, 113″ x 84,” Naples, Museo Nazionale di Capodimonte, since 1972 in deposit from the church of San Domenico Maggiore

Caravaggio’s The Flagellation of Christ continues the use of light to create dramatic scenes, enhanced by a divine presence. The work was possibly done in two stages, during his first stay in Naples in 1607, and completed on his return from Sicily in 1609-10. The composition reveals pentimenti, evidence of earlier paintings. The figures emerge from the dark background, structured by the dramatic light, a naturalist element (Strinati, 196). The dark background avoids the viewer from continuing into depth (Grove DOA). The scene of Christ considers the theme of human suffering and the solitude of pain, “redeemed by light that emanates from Christ” (Strinati, 198). With the emphasis upon human nature, Caravaggio maintained Counter-Reformation principles of engaging with the viewer through emotion and drama (Grove DOA). Caravaggio’s use of light and emotional emphasis continues to support the threatened Church.

Gash, John. “Caravaggio, Michelangelo Merisi da.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T013950, 5 February, 2013.

Sgarbi, Vittorio. Caravaggio. Skira: Milan. 2007.

Strinati, Claudio, ed. Caravaggio. Rome: Scuderie del Quirinale, 2010. Exhibition catalog.

Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio, The Burial of Saint Lucy, 1608, Early Baroque, Patron: Syracuse Senate, oil on canvas, 161″ x 118,” Syracuse, church of Santa Lucia al Sepolcro

Caravaggio’s The Burial of Saint Lucy utilizes light to lead the viewer’s focus, while being influenced by the context of the Counter-Reformation. The work was the first painted in Sicily, during Caravaggio’s stay in Syracuse from October 6, 1608-1609. Saint Lucy was a saint from Syracuse, connecting to the nondescript local setting of the composition, possibly the stone quarries of Syracuse. Saint Lucy is represented with a slit in her throat, instead of a severed head. Caravaggio continues to illustrate his abilities as a painter with the foreshortening of Saint Lucy’s right arm. Two gravediggers are in the foreground, serving as framing figures to bring the viewer’s focus onto the face of the saint, as her features remain “luminous,” while raking light is cast upon her face (Strinati, 215). During the creation of the work, Caravaggio was also under death sentence, possibly considering death in his treatment of the saint (Strinati, 216). The depiction of the saint also relates to the context of the Counter-Reformation, as Caravaggio considered the debate in Sicily concerning the martyr, and the need to resolve sacred subjects to strengthen the Catholic Church (Strinati, 216). Though the composition includes a large empty space, Caravaggio creates “an intimate participation in the funeral rite” (Strinati, 216). Caravaggio’s use of light connects to his characteristic technique to develop naturalism and drama, while depicting scenes that support the Counter-Reformation’s audience.

Gash, John. “Caravaggio, Michelangelo Merisi da.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T013950, 5 February, 2013.

Sgarbi, Vittorio. Caravaggio. Skira: Milan. 2007.

Strinati, Claudio, ed. Caravaggio. Rome: Scuderie del Quirinale, 2010. Exhibition catalog.

Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio, Raising of Lazarus, 1609, Early Baroque, Patron: Lazzari family, oil on canvas, 150″ x 108,” Messina, Museo Regionale (formerly in the church of the Padri Crociferi)

Caravaggio’s Raising of Lazarus represents the continual use of light to illustrate a dramatic moment. The work was completed during Caravaggio’s Naples years. In the composition, Christ points to the subject of his miracle, Lazarus, amidst a vague background. The surrounding figures do not realize the presence of Christ, as some heads become visible with the emanating light coming from behind them, combining with a physical and supernatural light (Sgarbi, 176). The supernatural light rests upon the body of Lazarus as he is brought back to life. Caravaggio focuses upon a specific dramatic moment, as the “current of energy transmitted from Christ’s hand to that of Lazarus” (Sgarbi, 176). With Caravaggio’s works completed in Malta and Sicily, he often left a large empty space in the compositions, with tight groups placed back from the picture plane, leading to figures becoming insignificant (Grove DOA). The compositional framework creates a detached drama, but continued “emotional intensity” with restrained gestures and expressions (Grove DOA). Caravaggio’s space and light creates a dramatic scene to engage the faithful.

Gash, John. “Caravaggio, Michelangelo Merisi da.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T013950, 5 February, 2013.

Sgarbi, Vittorio. Caravaggio. Skira: Milan. 2007.

Strinati, Claudio, ed. Caravaggio. Rome: Scuderie del Quirinale, 2010. Exhibition catalog.

Annibale Carracci

Annibale Carracci, The Butcher’s Shop, c. 1580, Early Baroque, oil on canvas, 6′ 4″ x 8′ 9,” Christ Church College, Oxford

Annibale Carracci’s (1560-1609) The Butcher’s Shop as an early work during his career, represents the shift from the maniera style to an emerging Baroque naturalism. Annibale Carracci, including his cousins Agostino and Ludovico rejected the maniera style of their home city, Bologna. The Butcher’s Shop as a genre subject relates to the unfolding naturalism. Carracci applies a rough impasto to represent the texture of the meat within the shop, contrasting to the previous smooth, refined surfaces of Mannerism. The focus upon meat possibly suggests Carracci working “assolutamente da viva carne,” absolutely from living flesh, working upon models and life instead of an idealized approach (Harris, 7-8). The emphasis upon life drawing led to the Carracci founding an academy in 1582, later called Accademia degli Incamminati, beginning by sharing models and practicing life drawing. Annibale’s work illustrates the shift from the previous Mannerism, to a new naturalism and importance of tangibility.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Annibale Carracci, The Choice of Hercules, 1597, Early Baroque, Patron: Cardinal Odoardo Farnese, oil on canvas, 65 3/4″ x 93 1/3.” original setting: Camerino Farnese, 1595-1597, fresco, 15′ 7″ x 30′ 9,” Palazzo Farnese, Rome, current setting: National Museum of Capodimonte, Naples

Annibale Carracci’s The Choice of Hercules connected to the Camerino’s decorative elements and continuing influence of classicism during the Baroque. Carracci moved to Rome in 1595 at the invitation of Cardinal Odoardo Farnese, the younger son of Duke Alessandro Farnese. Cardinal Odoardo commissioned Carracci to paint a large galleria of the accomplishments of the Duke in the Palazzo Farnese, but Carracci painted the ceiling of a smaller room first, the Camerino, the Cardinal’s private study. The Choice of Hercules, accompanied by the Camerino setting emphasized the virtuous choice (Harris, 24). The room includes a coved ceiling, with lunettes and curved triangular shapes outlined in gilded plaster frames, emphasizing the shape of the ceiling (Harris, 24). The room holds grisaille decorations imitating carved reliefs, such as satyrs and putti, along with circular reliefs of four of Hercules’s twelve labors. The four lunettes represent classical examples of virtuous behavior. Visual and literary antiquity influenced the subject matter and depiction in the Camerino (Harris, 25). The Choice of Hercules represents Hercules in the center, as Virtue is on the left, Vice on the right. The work portrays the struggle wit virtue, with an emphasis of light, and temptation, the darker side. Carracci was inspired by the Farnese Hercules in the palace courtyard, relating to the continuing influence of classical sources for Baroque artists. The classicism behind Carracci’s work offers an example of the diverse styles of the Baroque, contrasting with the extreme naturalism of Caravaggio.

Harris, Ann Sutherland. Seventeenth-Century Art & Architecture, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. 2008.

Van Tuyll van Serooskerken, C., et al. “Carracci.” Grove Art Online. Oxford Art Online. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordartonline.com.libproxy.temple.edu/subscriber/article/grove/art/T014340pg3. 11 February, 2013.